文章源自：吴超.大安全学基础理论研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(8): 1-13. DOI:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.08.1814.

中国知网  https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=dTSX2bdXfeAKoGTJDYBICImeRMRsGp3Q_DimWWIlJbzx34bJaIzZ0Am9dl45z7bhc0FMP0VHJPkaH2eq9oato7ZOwX5I89P2eopOrIGTWYiBpXBLbJitjc5LhOTzhvIs6Sux8dCtwfnoK_AQi35wtNWzg6jpl0mZBZHmcD3Hp6u9LxrVGI2bRA==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

大安全学基础理论研究

吴超

（1中南大学资源与安全工程学院，湖南长沙 410083；2中南大学安全理论创新与促进研究中心，湖南长沙 410083） 

中图分类号：D631,X91 

【摘要】为构建大安全学基础理论，综合运用文献调查法、资料统计法、逻辑演绎法、模型分析法等，开展系统性研究。首先，梳理近十余年大安全领域相关理论的研究历程及特点；其次，从多视角界定大安全的定义、内涵和特征，归纳其基础概念群与体系，构成大安全学的学科群；最后，归纳一种大安全学的研究范式及大安全原理的层次和类型，并针对预设场景构建2个大安全模型及其相关定义。研究结果明确了大安全的范畴及辨识准则；提炼出支撑大安全状态学、大安全元理学、大安全内因学、大安全系统学、大安全天灾学、大安全人祸学、大安全外因学、大安全防治学、大安全综合学和大安全边际学这10类大安全学科群的10组核心概念群，并给出这些大安全学科群的定义和范畴；梳理了一种大安全学的研究范式和大安全原理的分类体系，形成了适用于典型场景的建模方法和2个代表性模型。上述结果对夯实大安全学基础理论具有重要的作用。

【关键词】大安全；大安全学；概念群；大安全原理；大安全模型；国家安全学

Research on fundamental theory of macrosecurisafetyology

WU Chao

(1 School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410083, China;2 Safety & Security Theory Innovation and Promotion Center (STIPC), Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410083, China)

Abstract:In order to construct the fundamental theory of macrosecurisafetyology (which combines the meanings of security & safety sciencefor the large-scale issues), combined methods of literature review, data statistics, logical deduction and model analysis, etc. were used in this investigation. First, the research process and characteristics on the relevant theory of macrosecurisafety (which means the integrated security & safety for the large-scale issues)in the past decade were reviewed. Then, definitions, connotation, and characteristics of macrosecurisafety were given from multi perspectives, and a group of the basic concepts and their systems of macrosecurisafetyology were put forward. The disciplinary group that constitutes macrosecurisafetyology was built, and a research paradigm and principles of macrosecurisafetyology were summarized. Two macrosecurisafety models and their related definitions were builtaccording to two scenarios. The research results have clarified the scope and identification criteria of macrosecurisafety, extracted 10 sets of core concept groups supporting 10 macrosecurisafetyology subjects, including macrosecurisafety state studies, macrosecurisafety meta principle studies, macrosecurisafety internal cause studies, macrosecurisafety system studies, macrosecurisafety natural disaster studies, macrosecurisafety man-made disaster studies, macrosecurisafety external cause studies, macrosecurisafety prevention and control studies, macrosecurisafety comprehensive studies, and macrosecurisafety marginal studies, provided their definitions and scopes for these macrosecurisafetyology subjects, formed a research paradigm and classification for macrosecurisafetyology principles, and obtained a modeling method and two typical models for macrosecurisafetyology. The above results play an important role in consolidating the foundation of macrosecurisafetyology.

Keywords: macrosecurisafety; macrosecurisafetyology; concept group; macrosecurisafety principles; macrosecurisafety models; national security studies