[按：早先注意到一则知乎帖子，今特分享一则学界幽默。请勿当真 ^_^ ]

Occasionally, reviewers might write careless comments to authors' submissions (links omitted). So, it transpired upon an author who happened to have a lot of spare time. This time, he decided to make an improvement of the situation and wrote a long comments to the reviewer's comments, demanding a "major revision" for the comments to the manuscript. "What a surprise!", thought the editor in chief who happened to consider to innovate the reviewing process. "The writer of the manuscript is a mysterious super author", the editor added a comment and hinted the reviewer to fulfill a major revision of his comments. "I indeed did not fully understand the manuscript", reflected the reviewer and conducted a major revision of his comments to the manuscript. There were several rounds of minor revisions. Eventually, the reviewer's comments were "accepted" and the author's manuscript was published.