文章引用: 王令隽. 广义相对论百年终评[J]. 现代物理, 2016, 6(4): 99-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/mp.2016.6401
Modern Physics 现代物理, 2016, 6(4), 99-123
Published Online July 2016 in Hans. http://www.hanspub.org/journal/mp

广义相对论百年终评

王令隽[美国田纳西大学查塔努加分校物理系(终身教授)]

收稿日期：2016年7月8日；录用日期：2016年7月25日；发布日期：2016年7月28日
《广义相对论百年》的英文版登在网址是：
https://www.academia.edu/11961771/Hundred_Years_of_General_Relativity

Abstract：This article gives a systematic review of the theoretical framework, major predictions, experimental evidences of general relativity and its implications to other branches of science. It has been pointed out that, other than the (0,0) component of Einstein’s tensor field equation which reduces to the Newtonian law of gravitation under linear approximation, all other components either lead to di-vergence, or are in conflict with the fundamental postulation of relativity that no speed should ex￾ceed the speed of light, or defies physical interpretation. The review gives a detailed analysis of the three classical evidences of general relativity and has shown that none of these experimental evi￾dences can stand scrutiny. The article also analyzed the two recent experiments (BICEP2 and LIGO)that claimed to have found experimental evidences of gravitational wave and black hole, and dem￾onstrated their fallacies. It has been pointed out that the principle of relativity demands that any vi￾able theory must have translational as well as rotational relativity, which requires general relativity to have a rotational transformation that can transform the Schwarzschild metric into the Kerr me￾tric and vice versa. Calculations show that a general rotational transformation is in conflict with one of the fundamental postulations of relativity—no speed should exceed the speed of light, i.e., general relativity violates the principle of relativity. The article also gives a thorough analysis of one of the most important concept of general relativity—gravity comes from the curvature of space time, and gravity warps the space time. It has been pointed out that the curving of a geodesic is merely the bending of the trajectory of an object moving in gravitational field, which is not the curving of the space time itself. Moreover, the field equation describes the shape of equipotential, the curving of which is not the curving of space time either. The measure of curvature of space time is the Riemann curvature scalar R. Calculations show that the Riemann curvature and Ricii tensor of both the Schwarzschild metric and the Kerr metric—the only two known analytical solutions to Einstein’s field equation, vanish, which means that the space time is flat. The concept that gravity comes from the curvature of space time and gravity warps the space time is invalid. The review concludes that the Newtonian law of gravity is built upon the Keplers laws that represent enormous results of ob￾servational astronomy and has stood hundreds of years’ test by scientific research and engineering practice. It is still been checked every day by science and engineering, and has never failed the test. On the other hand, Einstein’s general relativity has a multitude of unsolvable inconsistencies in its fundamental postulations, theoretical framework, experimental tests, and it is completely powerless in practical applications. It is therefore incorrect to say that the Newtonian law of gravitation is only an approximation of the more accurate general relativity. As to the black home and the Big Bang cosmology derived and developed from general relativity, these are astrological theories that violate scientific logic. The author is strongly against brain washing the younger generations with the as-trological and theological concepts such as multiverse, reverse of causality, time travel, high dimen-sion, creation of the universe and so on. Physical science needs nothing less than a renaissance in the new century, returning to classical science from astrological paradigm.

Keywords：General Relativity, Big Bang, Black Hole, Gravitational Wave

——物理学家王令隽教授与网友互动讨论现代物理学问题

网友：我曾经不止一次的冥思苦想：开普勒第三定律的物理意义究竟是什么？r3/t2=k,为什么会是这样?
        引力问题之所以三百多年来悬而未决，其根子不在爱因斯坦，广义相对论只是一种尝试（爱因斯坦试图用弯曲时空来取代万有引力，但绕了一个大圈子最终也不得不重新回到引力上去，因为他解释不了空间为什么会弯曲）。追根溯源，还是应当重新回到牛顿哪儿去，甚至是伽利略那儿！所谓的“力”，究竟应当怎样定义？万有引力虽然有理论，有实验，也有实践，但这并不说明就是真理，不可碰。当年莱布尼茨的质疑和责难依旧有意义，我们不能让一个神秘的东西永远神秘下去。
        爱因斯坦是想解释万有引力的产生，他认为物体之间本无神秘的万有引力，只有物体的存在导致的空间弯曲。所以爱因斯坦没有“引力使空间弯曲的思想”，只是想用空间弯曲代替万有引力。然而他的这一解释，可能产生更多的疑问，甚至误导。这只是我的理解，当然也可能有误 。

王令隽回复：有些教科书确实说“以空间代替引力”，可是爱因斯坦为什么要这样代替？如果没有引力，空间怎么会平白无故地弯曲呢？引力和空间的弯曲，哪个是因哪个是果？从方程式看，右边是因，左边是果。
关于空间弯曲的问题，我在第十节中有专门讨论，并附上了参考文献，欢迎您进一步批评赐教。（英文原文在我的英文网站上有：https://utc.academia.edu/LingJunWang)。