契诃夫的《六号病房》
-----经久不衰的回响
最近读了契诃夫的《六号病房》，深感这是一部思想与艺术高度融合的杰作。它的主题穿越时空，回响至今！故特别分享给大家。
一、作品简介
《六号病房》（Ward No.6）是俄国作家契诃夫（Anton Chekhov，1860–1904）于1892年创作的中篇小说。作品通过对一所弥漫着污浊空气的精神病院及其病房的描写，塑造了拉金医生与“疯子”格罗莫夫这两位知识分子的典型形象。契诃夫借他们的悲剧，深刻批判了沙皇专制制度，并否定了托尔斯泰式的“勿以暴力抗恶”哲学。
列宁曾说，他年轻时读这部作品“觉得可怕极了”，仿佛“自己也被关在第六病室里了”。《六号病房》标志着契诃夫创作的转折点，是他在库页岛实地考察之后的重要成果。自此，他的中短篇小说呈现出更强烈的社会性、批判性与民主性。
1890年春，身体虚弱的契诃夫穿越西伯利亚，前往沙皇政府流放犯人的萨哈林岛——一座人间地狱。在那里，他亲眼目睹了各种野蛮、痛苦与灾难。这段经历使他逐渐疏远并否定了曾影响他六七年的托尔斯泰主义。1892年，《六号病房》与《在流放地》相继问世，契诃夫不仅批评了逆来顺受的不抗恶主义，也否定了苦行僧式的禁欲主义与看破红尘的悲观态度。
二、故事梗概
故事发生在俄国一个偏远小镇的县立医院。医院设施简陋，管理松散，尤其是精神病房——第六病房——环境极其恶劣，空气污浊，病人被粗暴对待，几乎无人关心他们的处境。
主治医生安德烈·叶菲米奇·拉金是一位受过教育、性格温和但极度冷漠的知识分子。他沉迷哲学，尤其是斯多葛主义，认为苦难是不可避免的，因而对病人的痛苦漠不关心。他不愿干预医院的腐败，也不愿改善病人的生活条件，选择以“理性”来逃避现实。
第六病房中住着五位病人，其中最引人注目的是伊万·德米特里奇·格罗莫夫。他原是公务员，因对社会不公产生强烈愤怒和焦虑，被诊断为精神病。格罗莫夫思维敏锐，言辞激烈，坚信人应当对不公正进行反抗。他的“疯癫”其实是一种道德清醒。
拉金医生偶然与格罗莫夫展开对话，两人就苦难、自由、责任等问题进行激烈辩论。格罗莫夫批判拉金的冷漠哲学，指出：“你之所以漠视苦难对人的负面影响，是因为你从未真正受过苦。”这些对话逐渐动摇了拉金的信念，使他开始反思自己的生活和职业。
然而，拉金的变化引起了医院同事和镇上人的怀疑。他与“疯子”的频繁交流被视为异常行为。在一场荒谬的官僚程序中，拉金被认定为精神异常，最终被关进了第六病房——他曾漠视的地方。
在病房中，拉金亲身体验了病人的痛苦。他被粗暴对待，失去了自由和尊严。他的哲学信仰彻底崩塌，意识到自己过去的冷漠是多么残忍。最终，他在病房中孤独死去。
三、结构与象征意义
契诃夫巧妙地安排了格罗莫夫与拉金之间的思想碰撞，使读者在“疯子”与“医生”之间不断转换视角。格罗莫夫的“疯癫”其实是对现实的清醒认知，而拉金的“理性”则是对现实的逃避。故事通过角色的反转，揭示了专制社会中对异见者的打压机制——敢于思考和发声的人被视为疯子，而真正的病态，是制度本身。
《六号病房》不仅是契诃夫艺术生涯的高峰之一，更是一部穿越时代的警世之作。它提醒我们：在任何社会中，若理性被制度所定义，若良知被诊断为病症，那么真正的疯癫，或许并不在病房之中。
原文：
https://m.99csw.com/book/1808/index.html
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/57333/57333-h/57333-h.htm#Alink2H_4_0002
Anton Chekhov’s Ward No. 6
I recently read Anton Chekhov’s Ward No. 6 and was deeply struck by its seamless fusion of thought and artistry. Its themes transcend time and continue to resonate today, which is why I feel compelled to share it with you.
I. Introduction to the Work
Ward No. 6 is a novella written in 1892 by Russian author Anton Chekhov (1860–1904). Through vivid depictions of a mental hospital filled with foul air and institutional decay, Chekhov crafts two archetypal intellectuals: Dr. Ragin and the “madman” Gromov. Their intertwined tragedies serve as a powerful critique of Tsarist autocracy and a rejection of Tolstoyan pacifism—the doctrine of “do not resist evil with violence.”
Lenin once remarked that reading this work in his youth was “terrifying,” as if “he himself had been locked inside Ward No. 6.” The novella marks a turning point in Chekhov’s literary career, emerging from his investigative journey to Sakhalin Island. From this moment on, his short fiction took on a sharper social edge, with heightened critical and democratic sensibilities.
In the spring of 1890, Chekhov—physically frail—traveled across Siberia to Sakhalin, a penal colony under the Tsarist regime. What he witnessed there was a living hell: brutality, suffering, and despair. These experiences led him to gradually distance himself from Tolstoyan philosophy, which had shaped his thinking for six or seven years. In 1892, Ward No. 6 and In Exile were published in succession. In these works, Chekhov not only criticized passive endurance of evil but also rejected asceticism and the pessimistic detachment from worldly affairs.
II. Plot Summary
The story takes place in a county hospital in a remote Russian town. The hospital is poorly equipped and loosely managed, with the psychiatric ward—Ward No. 6—being especially dilapidated. The air is foul, the patients are treated harshly, and no one seems to care about their suffering.
Dr. Andrey Yefimich Ragin, the hospital’s chief physician, is an educated and gentle man, but emotionally detached. He is obsessed with philosophy, particularly Stoicism, and believes that suffering is inevitable. As a result, he shows little compassion for his patients. He refuses to intervene in the hospital’s corruption or improve conditions, choosing instead to rationalize reality through “reason.”
Among the five patients in Ward No. 6, Ivan Dmitritch Gromov stands out. A former civil servant, Gromov was diagnosed with mental illness due to his intense anger and anxiety over social injustice. He is sharp-minded, articulate, and firmly believes that people must resist injustice. His “madness” is, in fact, a form of moral clarity.
Dr. Ragin begins conversing with Gromov, and the two engage in heated debates on suffering, freedom, and responsibility. Gromov challenges Ragin’s philosophical detachment, saying, “You can speak of suffering indifferently only because you’ve never truly suffered.” These exchanges gradually shake Ragin’s beliefs, prompting him to reflect on his life and profession.
However, Ragin’s transformation arouses suspicion among his colleagues and townspeople. His frequent interactions with the “madman” are seen as abnormal. In a farcical bureaucratic process, Ragin is declared mentally unstable and confined to Ward No. 6—the very place he once ignored.
Inside the ward, Ragin experiences the pain of the patients firsthand. He is treated roughly, stripped of freedom and dignity. His philosophical convictions collapse entirely, and he realizes how cruel his previous indifference had been. Ultimately, he dies alone in the ward.
III. Structure and Symbolism
Chekhov masterfully orchestrates the intellectual clash between Gromov and Ragin, prompting readers to constantly shift perspectives between “madman” and “doctor.” Gromov’s “madness” is actually a lucid recognition of reality, while Ragin’s “reason” is a form of evasion. Through this reversal of roles, the story exposes how autocratic societies suppress dissent—those who think and speak freely are labeled insane, while the true pathology lies within the system itself.
Ward No. 6 stands as one of Chekhov’s artistic pinnacles and a timeless warning. It reminds us that in any society, when reason is defined by institutions and conscience is diagnosed as illness, true madness may not reside within the ward at all.
Original:
https://m.99csw.com/book/1808/index.html
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/57333/57333-h/57333-h.htm#Alink2H_4_0002
转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自张博科学网博客。
链接地址：https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-701361-1501884.html?mobile=1
收藏
