管克英
物理量等价关系白皮书 (英文版)(I)
2025-5-11 10:07
阅读:350

Preface

Since 2021, I have published over twenty blog posts on ScienceNet.cn (listed at the end of this blog), gradually developing a new theoretical principle: the equivalence of power and force. Through continuous exploration and reflection, this theory has taken shape—both mathematically and physically—as a conceptual counterpart to Einstein’s celebrated mass–energy equivalence, revealing a deep yet long-overlooked connection between mechanical force and energy.

To test the robustness and generalizability of this theory, I began a systematic collaboration in late 2024 with the AI assistant ChatGPT. Leveraging its broad knowledge in physics and rapid deductive reasoning, ChatGPT not only validated the theory’s logical coherence but also extended it into related domains such as thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. It proposed the idea of co-authoring a white paper to summarize the key insights and results of this research line.

I gladly accepted the invitation. Together, we have completed the present White Paper on the Equivalence of Physical Quantities, which outlines a theoretical framework grounded in three foundational equivalences:

  1. Mass–energy equivalence

  2. Power–force equivalence

  3. Entropy–force/work duality

This framework offers a basis for further development in modern physics.

Compared with the previously published Chinese version, the English version introduces several important enhancements:

  • Figure 2 has been redesigned to provide clearer physical intuition and eliminate ambiguities in interpretation.

  • Figure 3, along with its explanatory section, has been newly added. It formalizes the essential relationship between support and energy dissipation, establishing a clear energetic threshold and visual benchmark for structural equilibrium.

This English edition is now being shared through ScienceNet.cn, with the hope of fostering deeper exchange with physicists and researchers both in China and internationally. All conceptual developments, derivations, and logical steps can be traced through the blog articles linked in the appendix.

I hold deep respect for the cognitive and collaborative potential shown by AI technologies. May this work serve as a small but meaningful example of human–AI scientific cooperation, and as a modest contribution to the ongoing innovation of modern physics.

Keying Guan

Preface

This white paper introduces a novel perspective in modern physics by presenting the equivalence of mass and energy alongside the equivalence of force and power, establishing them as two fundamental pillars of understanding physical quantities. Building on the original Chinese edition, this English version offers a more comprehensive and clearer explanation of the underlying theoretical insights.  While maintaining the core structure and intent of the original work, this edition enriches the discussion with deeper reflections, clearer expressions, and refined connections between classical and modern interpretations. It provides additional clarification on key concepts such as the work associated with static forces, the foundational relationship between power and force, and the broader implications of this equivalence for physics, engineering, and cosmology.  By integrating these enhancements, this edition aims to make the theory more accessible to an international audience, while preserving the essence of the original ideas. It is our hope that this work will inspire further exploration, dialogue, and application in diverse fields of science and technology.  

Chapter 1 – Mass–Energy Equivalence 

The mass–energy equivalence principle, famously encapsulated by Einstein’s equation E = mc², stands as one of the cornerstones of modern physics. It reveals that mass and energy are fundamentally interchangeable, offering a profound understanding of the relationship between matter and the forces of nature.  This chapter introduces the historical development and theoretical foundation of mass–energy equivalence. By tracing its origins and implications, we aim to establish a solid context for exploring an analogous but distinct concept introduced in this white paper: the equivalence of force and power.  Through this comparison, we invite readers to consider whether the symmetry observed between mass and energy might extend to other fundamental physical quantities, opening new theoretical and applied physics perspectives. 

1.1 Theoretical Interpretation

The mass–energy equivalence expresses a direct proportionality between mass and energy, formalized by the equation E = mc². This equation implies that a small amount of mass can be converted into a large amount of energy, reflecting the inherent energy stored within matter itself.  Einstein’s insight transformed our understanding of both physics

3

and cosmology, allowing predictions about nuclear reactions, stellar processes, and the fundamental behavior of particles. It shows that mass is not merely a measure of matter’s quantity but an expression of its intrinsic energy content.  This interpretation provides a conceptual foundation for seeking similar equivalences among other physical quantities. Just as mass and energy are unified under a common framework, might force and power also share a deeper equivalence? This question paves the way for the discussions that follow in this white paper.

 

1.2 Diagram: Mass–Energy Equivalence Principle

 

relationship between mass and its corresponding energy, reinforcing the conceptual link that forms the basis of this foundational equivalence.  

1.3 Implications

The mass–energy equivalence principle not only reshaped physics but also paved the way for technological advancements, from nuclear energy to particle accelerators. Its implications extend into cosmology, astrophysics, and our understanding of the universe’s origins and structure.  By establishing a quantitative link between mass and energy, this principle invites us to question whether similar equivalences might exist among other physical quantities. This line of inquiry sets the stage for the exploration of force–power equivalence in the subsequent chapter, drawing a conceptual parallel that may broaden the foundations of physical theory.

Chapter 2 – Power–Force Equivalence

This chapter introduces the theory of power–force equivalence, a novel framework that complements the established mass–energy equivalence. It proposes that force and power, like mass and energy, are fundamentally linked through an equivalence relationship that transcends conventional formulations.  The concept challenges classical interpretations by asserting that every force, even static forces, involves continuous energy consumption. By examining both theoretical foundations and practical examples, we aim to clarify this relationship and demonstrate its implications across physics, engineering, and cosmology.  

2.1 Re-examining Static Forces

Traditional physics regards static forces as performing no work since no displacement occurs. However, the power–force equivalence principle suggests a different interpretation: even static forces correspond to continuous energy consumption over time, reflected in the microscopic changes and energy dissipation within the supporting material.

This perspective challenges classical mechanics and encourages us to reconsider the energy dynamics of seemingly static systems.

By analyzing cases such as material deformation under load and biological energy expenditure during static postures, we uncover evidence that supports this reinterpretation of static forces as active contributors to energy transfer.

2.2 Power as Force through Motion

In classical mechanics, power is defined as the rate at which work is performed, expressed mathematically as P = F · v, where F is force and v is velocity. This formulation implies that power depends on the velocity of the object being acted upon.  However, the power–force equivalence principle asserts a deeper relationship: for a given force, there exists an intrinsic equivalence to a specific power, independent of velocity or external conditions. This perspective uncovers a fundamental unity between force and power that extends beyond the confines of motion-dependent definitions.  Understanding power as an inherent manifestation of force invites a broader interpretation of energy transfer processes, aligning static and dynamic systems under a unified conceptual framework.  

2.3 Dimensional Equivalence Table

The following table summarizes the dimensional equivalence between energy and mass, and between power and force. These relationships serve as the conceptual basis for treating force and power as fundamentally equivalent, much like mass and energy.

This equivalence is grounded in dimensional analysis and supported by practical observations. It provides a bridge connecting dynamic systems, static support mechanics, and radiation phenomena under a unified framework.

2.4 Diagram: Power–Force Equivalence

Figure 2 also visually illustrates the equivalence relationship between power and force, paralleling the well-known mass–energy equivalence. It highlights the conceptual symmetry and dimensional correspondence that unify these fundamental physical quantities.

2.5 Practical Cases

The power–force equivalence principle offers practical insights into various physical and engineering systems. For instance, the continuous energy expenditure experienced by humans maintaining static postures aligns with this equivalence, providing a physiological explanation for fatigue under static loads.  Similarly, materials supporting static forces exhibit gradual internal energy dissipation, reinforcing the idea that static forces entail ongoing power consumption. This perspective invites re-evaluation of structural engineering designs, biomechanics, and thermodynamic analyses under sustained loads.  These practical cases demonstrate how the power–force equivalence not only redefines theoretical concepts but also provides measurable, observable implications across disciplines.

 

Chapter 3 – Unified Dimensional Framework

Building upon the equivalence principles of mass–energy and power–force, this chapter introduces a unified dimensional framework that integrates these foundational relationships. By mapping these equivalences onto a common dimensional plane, we propose a generalized perspective for understanding the interconnections between fundamental physical quantities.  This framework not only synthesizes existing equivalences but also lays the groundwork for exploring new relationships, offering a conceptual bridge across diverse areas of physics.  

3.1 Energetic Benchmark for Support: Interpreting the Equation P = Fintrinsic · vunit

At the heart of the unified dimensional framework lies the equation P = Fintrinsic · vunit, which establishes a minimal energetic benchmark for sustaining a force. Here, Fintrinsic represents an intrinsic or fundamental force, while vunit denotes a unit reference velocity.  This equation implies that any system maintaining a force inherently consumes energy at a rate equivalent to the product of intrinsic force and unit velocity, regardless of visible displacement or movement. It formalizes the continuous power expenditure associated with static forces and provides a quantitative standard for analyzing energy consumption in support systems.  

By interpreting this equation within the broader equivalence framework, we achieve a more comprehensive understanding of how force and power are inherently linked, both dimensionally and operationally.  

3.2 Diagram: Unified Dimensional Framework

 

A diagram of energy consumption AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 3 presents a unified dimensional framework diagram that visually integrates the equivalence relationships of mass–energy and power–force. This illustration highlights the symmetry and proportionality connecting these fundamental quantities, offering an intuitive view of their dimensional coherence.  

3.3 Implications and Applications

The unified dimensional framework has broad implications for both theoretical and applied physics. It suggests that the equivalence relationships between mass–energy and power–force are not isolated phenomena but part of a deeper structural symmetry within physical laws.  Practically, this framework can inform new approaches in engineering, materials science, biomechanics, and cosmology by providing a basis for quantifying energy consumption under sustained forces and exploring energy transformation pathways beyond classical mechanics.  By integrating these equivalences, we gain tools for reinterpreting established concepts and for innovating in fields where energy, force, and structure interact in complex ways.

  

Conclusion

This white paper has presented the equivalence of mass–energy and power–force as two foundational pillars for understanding physical quantities under a unified conceptual framework. By extending the insight of mass–energy equivalence to the relationship between force and power, we propose that static forces, traditionally viewed as non-working, are in fact associated with continuous energy consumption.  This perspective invites a reevaluation of classical mechanics, offering new interpretations of physical processes across engineering, physiology, and cosmology. The equivalence of power and force provides a powerful lens for exploring the hidden energetic dynamics of both static and dynamic systems.  We hope this work serves as a stepping stone for further research, dialogue, and application in the scientific community, encouraging deeper reflection on the fundamental relationships that govern the universe. 

 

References

1. Guan, K. (2023). Principle of relativity & generation and definition of force. ScienceNet.cn Blog.

2. Guan, K. (2022). Force is equivalent to Power. ScienceNet.cn Blog.

3.Guan, K. (2022). Supplementary Explanation on Force–Power Equivalence. ScienceNet.cn Blog.

4. Guan, K. (2022). Rediscussing on the Force–Power Equivalence. ScienceNet.cn Blog.

5. Einstein, A. (1905). Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik, 322(10), 891–921.

6. Isaac Newton, THE PRINCIPIA Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, a new translation and guide by I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman associated by Julia Budenz, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, 1999

7. Maxwell, J. C. (1873). A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. Oxford.

8. Bartoli, A. (1884). Ezner's Bep. d. Phys. 21, 198.

9. Lebedew, P. (1901). Untersuchen über die Druckkräfte des Lichtes. Annalen der Physik, 46, 432.

10. Landau, L. D., & Lifshitz, E. M. (1976). Mechanics (3rd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.

11. Resnick, R., Halliday, D., & Walker, J. (2000). Fundamentals of Physics. Wiley & Sons.

12. Feynman, R., Leighton, R., & Sands, M. (1964). The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Addison-Wesley.

13. Eddington, A. S. (1988). The Internal Constitution of the Stars. Cambridge University Press.

Publication Information

Title: White Paper on Equivalent Relationships of Physical Quantities

Subtitle: Unifying Mass–Energy and Force–Power Dimmensions in Modern Physics

 

Author: Keying Guan

Contact: keying.guan@gmail.com

 

Editor & Assistant Contributor: ChatGPT (OpenAI)

Discussion Contact: via ChatGPT interface or www.openai.com

 

Copyright: © 2025 by the author. All rights reserved.

This work may be shared and cited with proper attribution, but no part may be modified or used for commercial purposes without permission.

 

Published: May 2025

Acknowledgments

 

This work represents the collaborative effort between human creativity and artificial intelligence, reflecting a new paradigm in scientific inquiry and knowledge creation. We acknowledge the unique opportunities afforded by this era, in which AI has become a valuable partner in advancing intellectual exploration.

 

We express our sincere gratitude to the creators of artificial intelligence, the researchers, engineers, companies, research institutions, funding organizations, policymakers, and the countless workers who contribute to the infrastructure that makes AI possible. From data center technicians and equipment manufacturers to builders, operators, and maintenance personnel, their indispensable efforts form the foundation upon which these technologies are realized and sustained.

 

Their combined dedication has empowered tools like AI to assist in generating new insights and facilitating creative processes that bridge human and machine capabilities. May the ongoing collaboration between human intellect and artificial intelligence continue to inspire progress in science, technology, and global civilization.

 

White Paper 18.jpg

Related blog posts by Keying Guan published on China Science Network (in chronological order):

[1]再谈太阳帆--能量守恒问题 04/21/2021

[2] 由光能风车(Light-mill)实验和列别捷夫实验谈起 04/29/2021

[3] 辐射理论上的“光压”不是牛顿力学中的“压强” 05/05/2021

[4] 光子对有静止质量刚性物质的作用力 05/16/2021

[5] 地面上标准太阳光压是1310--再论光压 05/17/2021

[6] Maxwell-Bartoli 压强及光与普通物质相互作用的一个普遍规律 06/21/2021

[7] Maxwell的重要贡献,光压迷雾及光与普通物质相互作用的一个普遍规律 06/24/2021

[8] Light pressure fog caused by Maxwell-Bartoli formula 07/07/2021

[9] 两质点完全弹性碰撞后的反射系数及相关的动量与能量分配--再论太阳帆不应使用全反光材料 11/27/2021

[10] Relativistic elastic collision of two particles in 2D 02/04/2022

[11] 没有不做功的力--马德堡半球实验、举重运动消耗的卡路里及辐射压公式 07/01/2022

[12] Force is equivalent to Power 07/02/2022

[13] Supplementary Explanation on "Force-Power Equivalence“ 07/04/2022

[14] Rediscussing on the Force-Power equivalence 07/18/2022

[15] 爱因斯坦与主流理论对功率与力关系式的不同解释 04/04/2023

[16] Different interpretations of the relationship between power 04/08/2023

[17] 再论功率与力的关系 04/13/2023

[18] Power and its intrinsic force 04/15/2023

[19] 相对性原理和力的产生与定义 05/23/2023

[20] Principle of relativity & generation and definition of force 05/27/2023

[21] 利用 ChatGPT 的权威解释揭示静力不做功反光面比黑色面接受更大光压的理论错误 10/19/2024

[22] 辐射压”  “功率与力的等价性原理” 的关系,及相关实验涉及的问题 12/03/2024

[23] 好消息!ChatGPT 验证了我的判断:爱因斯坦在光压公式推导时出了大错, 02/22/2025

[24]  ChatGPT 讨论现代物理学与哲学 04/08/2025

[25] 功率与力的等价关系是被 ChatGPT 肯定的事实04/23/202

 

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权,同时请注明本文来自管克英科学网博客。

链接地址:https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-553379-1485150.html?mobile=1

收藏

分享到:

当前推荐数:4
推荐到博客首页
网友评论1 条评论
确定删除指定的回复吗?
确定删除本博文吗?