yueliusd07017的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/yueliusd07017

博文

预印本:阻碍科学进步的根本原因

已有 498 次阅读 2025-7-25 23:12 |个人分类:微波吸收|系统分类:科研笔记

Preprint: The Entrenched Problems of Scientific Progress

本文试图回答这个问题:

在现代出版界,为什么没有创新的垃圾文章可以大量发表,

颠覆性创新这种推动科学进步的稿件的发表怎么就这么难。

https://www.163.com/dy/article/FEE1RTDF05419EOY.html

历史学家李伯重:无论何种“学术垃圾”,都是有害的,而且都是公害

历史学家李伯重:无论何种“学术垃圾”,都是有害的,而且都是公害

Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science | PLOS Medicine

Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science

Published: October 7, 2008

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050201

文章认为:

阻碍科学进步的根本原因不是科学论证没有被发现,而是看不见的人文因素:

Scientific progress is often hindered not by lack of evidence or rational discourse, but by institutional inertia, power structures, and the human tendency to resist paradigm-shifting ideas.

The peer review system, while intended to maintain quality standards, has evolved into a mechanism that frequently stifles innovation and perpetuates established orthodoxies.

The advancement of scientific knowledge has never been a purely rational process guided solely by empirical evidence and logical reasoningThroughout history, the scientific community has grappled with deeply entrenched problems that resist solution despite clear evidence of their existence and harmful effects. These problems manifest across multiple dimensions of scientific practice, from individual resistance to new ideas to systemic failures in quality control and institutional gatekeeping.

Why do demonstrably false theories persist for decades?

How do fraudulent researchers maintain their positions for years despite mounting evidence of misconduct?

What role do peer review and academic hierarchies play in either facilitating or hindering scientific progress?

Scientific revolutions are "non-rational, rather than spread through 'mere force of truth and fact'"

The peer review system, while intended to maintain quality standards, often functions as a mechanism for enforcing orthodoxy and resisting unconventional ideas. Studies have shown that highly influential papers are frequently rejected by prestigious journals, with some of the most impactful work being initially dismissed by gatekeepers.

This dynamic is particularly problematic in fields where established theories face challenges from new evidence or alternative frameworks. The resistance is not merely academic.

The peer review system, as currently implemented, shows fundamental limitations in detecting fraud and ensuring research quality.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hda0_31_dyc

Why has there been no progress in physics since 1973?

yueliusd’s Substack | Substack



https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1495232.html

上一篇:新预印本:为什么大概率事件经常是错的
下一篇:预印本:敢于挑战权威学术机构的错误
收藏 IP: 174.164.255.*| 热度|

16 刘进平 郑永军 孙颉 朱晓刚 杨正瓴 钱大鹏 雒运强 崔锦华 尤明庆 周政 王涛 高宏 宁利中 朱林 范振英 池德龙

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (11 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2025-8-2 15:45

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部