前文

REVOLUTIONARY WAVE MECHANICS THEORY CHALLENGES SCIENTIFIC ESTABLISHMENT

的中文翻译（机器翻译）

海报：开创性科学研究（学术革命性的微波吸收波动力学理论） 

           -- 挑战科学主流突破学术偏见，推进微波吸收科学

作者： 刘跃，沈阳师范大学化学与化学工程学院

联系方式： yueliusd@163.com

DOI： 10.20944/preprints202507.0015.v2

1. Yue Liu. Non-Mainstream Scientific Viewpoints in Microwave Absorption Research: Peer Review, Academic Integrity, and Cargo Cult Science, Preprints.org, preprint, 2025, DOI:10.20944/preprints202507.0015.v2, Supplementary Materials

2. Yue Liu, Michael G.B. Drew, Ying Liu,Theoretical Insights Manifested by Wave Mechanics Theory of Microwave Absorption—Part 1: A Theoretical Perspective, Preprints.org, Preprint, 2025, DOI:10.20944/preprints202503.0314.v4, supplementary.docx (919.54KB ).

3. Yue Liu, Michael G.B. Drew, Ying Liu, Theoretical Insights Manifested by Wave Mechanics Theory of Microwave Absorption—Part 2: A Perspective Based on the Responses from DeepSeek, Preprints.org, Preprint, 2025, DOI:10.20944/preprints202504.0447.v3, Supplementary Materials IVB.

突破性发现

本研究揭示了主流微波吸收理论的根本性缺陷，提出了革命性的微波吸收波动力学理论，为薄膜吸收机制提供了精确解释。同时，研究还揭示了学术同行评审体系中抑制创新观点的系统性问题。

主要创新贡献

1. 波动力学理论革命

• 挑战长期主导领域的阻抗匹配理论

• 为薄膜微波吸收提供精确的波动力学解释

• 预测能力远超传统模型

2. 同行评审体系改革

• 揭示主流学术出版中的系统性偏见

• 详实记录了主要期刊的拒稿案例

• 提出透明化改革建议，恢复学术诚信

3. 伪科学现象识别

• 识别出类似费曼所说的“Cargo Cult Science不得科学要领的科学程式狂人”现象

• 呼吁以科学严谨性取代体制缺陷

• 挑战阻碍创新的学术等级体系

已发表的突破性成果

波动力学理论已成功发表于专业期刊：

1. 波动力学综述（2024）

• 刘跃，刘颖，Michael G. B. Drew. “薄膜微波吸收的波动力学：简要综述。” Optics and Laser Technology, 2024, 178, 111211

2. 薄膜与材料的区别（2024）

• 刘跃，刘颖，Michael G. B. Drew. “薄膜微波吸收的波动力学——区分薄膜与材料。” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2024, 593, 171850

3. 多层薄膜理论（2024）

• 刘跃，刘颖，Michael G. B. Drew. “薄膜微波吸收的波动力学：多层薄膜。” Journal of Electronic Materials, 2024, 53, 8154–8170

当前的问题：发表成功后依然面临的体制性阻力

尽管取得发表成功，科学界对这些突破性成果依然选择忽视：

• 主流学者仍然坚持错误理论，继续发表相关主流理论的论文，且未提及相反观点

• 波动力学理论相关论文发表后，学界反响寥寥

• 体制惯性阻碍了理论纠正的广泛认可

核心问题：“在现有出版体系下，多数人犯的错误不允许被指出。”

解决方案：通过透明化实现系统性改革推广波动力学理论

微波吸收波动力学理论为薄膜微波吸收提供了正确的物理解释，取代了有缺陷的阻抗匹配理论。

建立稿件评审中的审稿人和编辑学术不端数据库

系统性改革的革命性建议：“建立公开的编辑偏见、审稿人不当行为、机构阻碍纠错案例数据库，有助于学界从中吸取教训。”

 恢复科学诚信

直面根本挑战：

• 将编辑的学术不端透明地记录在案

• 透明记录就是公开问责审稿人不当行为

• 追踪阻碍纠错的体制，防止创新观点被压制

革命性影响

本研究倡导在微波吸收科学和学术出版伦理领域带来了范式转变：

 科学进步：

• 为材料科学应用提供正确的波动力学理论

• 深化对微波吸收机制的理解

• 奠定新一代材料设计基础

 学术改革：

• 提供透明、证据导向的同行评审改革愿景

• 保护创新科学观点

• 建立追踪制度性学术不端的数据库

研究共同体受益：

• 鼓励非主流科学探索

• 推动系统性纠错机制

• 挑战阻碍主流范式转变的体制性阻力

已发表论文揭示系统性问题

波动力学理论相关论文揭示了当前学术体系的关键缺陷：

• 推翻现行微波吸收理论的核心论文均在多次被拒后才得以发表

• 每篇论文均经历了体制性阻力

• 主流期刊在评审过程中无视坚实的理论基础

这一模式凸显了学术出版体系亟需系统性改革。

加入科学革命

行动号召：本研究表明，真正的科学进步需要理论创新与体制改革并重。

数据库建设倡议：支持建立公开数据库，追踪：

• 编辑学术不端案例及模式

• 审稿人不当行为与机构阻力

• 被压制的纠错机制

合作机会：

• 对波动力学理论感兴趣的研究者

• 支持同行评审改革的学者

• 致力于透明与学术诚信的机构

研究成果：

• 已发表论文： 见Optics and Laser Technology、Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials、Journal of Electronic Materials等刊物

• 预印本： 见Preprints.org (DOI: 10.20944/preprints202507.0015.v2)等

• 联系作者： yueliusd@163.com

 革命性影响：本海报突出展示了波动力学理论的突破性成果，并呼吁通过体制改革防止创新科学观点被压制，推动学术界健康发展。

Non-mainstream viewpoints - Peeref

Yue Liu – Kudos: Growing the influence of research

Ethical problems in academic peer review - Peeref

The Accepted Theories Have Been Overturned - Peeref

Challenging a peer-reviewed paper got my review shut down - Peeref

A calm review turned into academic chaos - Peeref

References

(1) Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Drew, M. G. B. Recognizing Problems in Publications Concerned with Microwave Absorption Film and Providing Corrections: A Focused Review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2025, 64 (7), 3635–3650. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.4c04544.

(2) Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Drew, M. G. B. Review of Wave Mechanics Theory for Microwave Absorption by Film. Journal of Molecular Science 2024, 40 (4), 300-305. DOI: 10.13563/j.cnki.jmolsci.2023.06.018.

(3) Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Drew, M. G. B. Wave mechanics of microwave absorption in films: A short review. Optics and Laser Technology 2024, 178, 111211. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.111211.

(4) Peer Review and Editorial Boards. 2025. https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/scholarly-publishing/diversity-equity-and-inclusion-in-scholarly-communication/peer-review-and-editorial-boards/.

(5) Gotzsche, P. C. Citation bias: questionable research practice or scientific misconduct? J R Soc Med 2022, 115 (1), 31-35. DOI: 10.1177/01410768221075881  From NLM Medline.

(6) Joober, R.; Schmitz, N.; Annable, L.; Boksa, P. Publication bias: what are the challenges and can they be overcome? J Psychiatry Neurosci 2012, 37 (3), 149-152. DOI: 10.1503/jpn.120065  From NLM Medline.

(7) Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Drew, M. G. B. Wave mechanics of microwave absorption in films - Distinguishing film from material. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 2024, 593, 171850. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.171850.

(8) Liu, Y.; Drew, M. G. B.; Liu, Y. Theoretical insights manifested by wave mechanics theory of microwave absorption—Part 1: A theoretical perspective. Preprints.org 2025. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202503.0314.v4.

(9) Liu, Y.; Drew, M. G. B.; Liu, Y. Theoretical insights manifested by wave mechanics theory of microwave absorption — Part 2: A perspective based on the responses from DeepSeek. Preprints.org 2025. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202503.0314.v3

(10) Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Drew, M. G. B. Wave Mechanics of Microwave Absorption in Films: Multilayered Films. Journal of Electronic Materials 2024, 53, 8154–8170. DOI: 10.1007/s11664-024-11370-9.

(11) Bias in peer review. https://publicationethics.org/topic-discussions/bias-peer-review .

(12) 2.7 Dealing with biased reporting of the available evidence. https://www.jameslindlibrary.org/essays-essay/2-7-dealing-with-biased-reporting-of-the-available-evidence/.

(13) Dickersin, K. How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. AIDS Educ Prev. 1997, Feb;9(1 Suppl), 15-21.

(14) Rye, K. A.; Davidson, N. O.; Burlingame, A. L.; Guengerich, F. P. Working toward reducing bias in peer review. J Biol Chem 2021, 297 (4), 101243. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101243  From NLM PubMed-not-MEDLINE.

(15) Squirrel, S. S. Peer review bias and double-blind reviewing: a new study. 2023. https://scientistseessquirrel.wordpress.com/2023/04/11/peer-review-bias-and-double-blind-reviewing-a-new-study/ .

(16) Publication Bias. http://ds-wordpress.haverford.edu/psych2015/projects/chapter/publication-bias/ (accessed.

(17) Do you feel that peer-review has become so biased that it is allowing poor quality work from some of the more famous research groups to be published without scrutiny? https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/comments/101y4n8/do_you_feel_that_peerreview_has_become_so_biased/ .

(18) Kwee, T. C.; Almaghrabi, M. T.; Kwee, R. M. Scientific Fraud, Publication Bias, and Honorary Authorship in Nuclear Medicine. J Nucl Med 2023, 64 (2), 200-203. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264679  From NLM Medline.

(19) Kalla, J. L.; Aronow, P. M. Editorial Bias in Crowd-Sourced Political Information. PLoS One 2015, 10 (9), e0136327. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136327  From NLM Medline.

(20) Matías-Guiu, J.; García-Ramos, R. Editorial bias in scientific publications. Neurología (English Edition) 2011, 26 (1), 1-5. DOI: 10.1016/s2173-5808(11)70001-3.

(21) Aczel, B.; Barwich, A. S.; Diekman, A. B.; Fishbach, A.; Goldstone, R. L.; Gomez, P.; Gundersen, O. E.; von Hippel, P. T.; Holcombe, A. O.; Lewandowsky, S.; et al. The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2025, 122 (5), e2401232121. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2401232121  From NLM Medline.

(22) Lee, S. 7 Proven Methods to Combat Publication Bias Now. 2025. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/blog7-methods-combat-publication-bias .

(23) Liu, Y. The Accepted Theories Have Been Overturned. 2024. https://www.peeref.com/hubs/219 (accessed.

(24) Liu, Y. Ethical problems in academic peer review. https://www.peeref.com/hubs/218.

(25) Non-mainstream viewpoints. Liu, Yue. https://www.peeref.com/hubs/345.

(26) Liu, Y.; Yang, K.; Liu, Y.; Drew, M. G. B. The Shackles of Peer Review: Unveiling the Flaws in the Ivory Tower. arXiv 2023. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.05966.

(27) Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Drew, M. G. B. A Re-evaluation of the mechanism of microwave absorption in film – Part 2: The real mechanism. Materials Chemistry and Physics 2022, 291, 126601. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126601.

(28) Su, P.; He, M. The impact of innovative behaviors on academic misconduct among graduate students: a mediated moderation model. Front Psychol 2023, 14, 1276700. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1276700  From NLM PubMed-not-MEDLINE.