The "Infant-Like" Adaptive DIKWP Semantic Mathematics
Yucong Duan
International Standardization Committee of Networked DIKWP for Artificial Intelligence Evaluation(DIKWP-SC)
World Artificial Consciousness CIC(WAC)
World Conference on Artificial Consciousness(WCAC)
(Email: duanyucong@hotmail.com)
Abstract
This document enhances the previous examination of the concrete mechanisms underlying the Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom-Purpose (DIKWP) Semantic Mathematics framework proposed by Prof. Yucong Duan. Building upon the initial mechanisms, we introduce the concept of adaptive learning and tradeoff management, inspired by infant cognitive development. This addition emphasizes the framework's capacity to test and validate transformations among DIKWP components, adapting to tradeoffs between precision and efficiency under the overarching goal of effectiveness. By incorporating these adaptive mechanisms, the framework becomes more robust and creative, mirroring the natural learning processes observed in human infants.
Table of Contents
Introduction
1.1. Overview of DIKWP Semantic Mathematics
1.2. Objectives of the Document
Foundational Concepts and Notations
2.1. Mathematical Representation of Semantics
2.2. Notational Conventions
Mechanisms of the DIKWP Components
3.1. Data (Sameness)
3.2. Information (Difference)
3.3. Knowledge (Completeness)
3.4. Wisdom
3.5. Purpose
Semantic Integration in Mathematical Operations
4.1. Formal Bundling of Concepts with Semantics
4.2. Semantic Abstraction and Reification
Adaptive Learning and Tradeoff Management
5.1. Infant-Like Mechanisms for Testing and Validation
5.2. Balancing Precision and Efficiency
5.3. Effectiveness as the Guiding Principle
Dynamic Evolution of Mathematical Models
6.1. Evolutionary Algorithms and Processes
6.2. Handling Inconsistencies: The "BUG" Theory
Human Cognition Modeling
7.1. Cognitive Structures in Mathematics
7.2. Subjectivity and First-Person Perspective
Application in Artificial Intelligence
8.1. Constructing Artificial Consciousness
8.2. Semantic AI Systems
Examples and Case Studies
9.1. Example: Adaptive Learning in Semantic Data Processing
9.2. Example: Tradeoff Management in Purpose-Driven Optimization
Conclusion
10.1. Summary of Enhanced Mechanisms
10.2. Implications and Future Work
References
1. Introduction1.1. Overview of DIKWP Semantic Mathematics
The DIKWP Semantic Mathematics framework integrates semantics, purpose, dynamism, and human consciousness into mathematical practice. Inspired by human cognitive development, particularly in infants, the framework emphasizes adaptive learning mechanisms that balance precision and efficiency to achieve overall effectiveness.
1.2. Objectives of the Document
This document aims to:
Detail the concrete mechanisms of the DIKWP framework with an emphasis on adaptive learning.
Explain how the framework allows testing and validation among DIKWP transformations.
Illustrate how tradeoffs between precision and efficiency are managed under the goal of effectiveness.
Provide examples demonstrating these enhanced mechanisms.
2. Foundational Concepts and Notations2.1. Mathematical Representation of Semantics
Semantics are explicitly represented within mathematical constructs using semantic tuples (v,s)(v, s)(v,s), where vvv is the value, and sss is the semantic annotation.
2.2. Notational Conventions
Sets and Elements: Uppercase letters denote sets (e.g., DDD for Data), and lowercase letters denote elements (e.g., d∈Dd \in Dd∈D).
Functions and Mappings: Functions are represented as f:X→Yf: X \rightarrow Yf:X→Y.
Operators: Operators are defined with semantic considerations.
3. Mechanisms of the DIKWP Components
The DIKWP components function as before but now include adaptive mechanisms inspired by infant learning.
3.1. Data (Sameness)
Data consists of observations characterized by sameness.
Data Set DDD: D={(di,si)∣i∈I}D = \{ (d_i, s_i) \mid i \in I \}D={(di,si)∣i∈I}
Sameness Relation RsR_sRs: Identifies shared attributes.
3.2. Information (Difference)
Information arises from identifying differences in data.
Difference Function δ\deltaδ: δ:D×D→I\delta: D \times D \rightarrow Iδ:D×D→I
Adaptive Thresholds: Thresholds for detecting differences adjust based on feedback, similar to an infant learning to distinguish stimuli.
3.3. Knowledge (Completeness)
Knowledge integrates information into a coherent structure.
Integration Function ϕ\phiϕ: ϕ:P(I)→K\phi: \mathcal{P}(I) \rightarrow Kϕ:P(I)→K
Adaptive Integration: The system tests various combinations of information to form knowledge, selecting those that optimize effectiveness.
3.4. Wisdom
Wisdom applies knowledge with judgment.
Wisdom Function Ψ\PsiΨ: Ψ:K×Θ→W\Psi: K \times \Theta \rightarrow WΨ:K×Θ→W
Validation Mechanism: Wisdom includes validating decisions against outcomes, adjusting future applications accordingly.
3.5. Purpose
Purpose guides actions towards goals.
Purpose Function PPP: P:{Processes}→{Outcomes}P: \{ \text{Processes} \} \rightarrow \{ \text{Outcomes} \}P:{Processes}→{Outcomes}
Adaptive Goal Setting: Goals may evolve based on feedback, much like an infant adjusting its objectives through exploration.
4. Semantic Integration in Mathematical Operations4.1. Formal Bundling of Concepts with Semantics
Semantic tuples ensure operations respect meanings, with adaptive mechanisms to refine semantic associations based on results.
4.2. Semantic Abstraction and Reification
Adaptive Abstraction: The system tests different levels of abstraction to balance generality and specificity.
Feedback Loop: Outcomes inform adjustments in abstraction levels.
5. Adaptive Learning and Tradeoff Management5.1. Infant-Like Mechanisms for Testing and Validation
The framework emulates infant learning by:
Exploratory Testing: Trying various transformations among DIKWP components.
Feedback Evaluation: Assessing outcomes to guide future actions.
Incremental Learning: Gradually refining processes based on successes and failures.
5.2. Balancing Precision and Efficiency
Tradeoff Management: The system adjusts the level of precision and efficiency in its processes.
Adaptive Thresholds: Precision levels are relaxed or tightened based on effectiveness.
Resource Allocation: Efficiency is managed by allocating computational resources where they are most impactful.
5.3. Effectiveness as the Guiding Principle
Effectiveness Function EEE:
E:A→RE: A \rightarrow \mathbb{R}E:A→R
where AAA is the set of actions, and E(A)E(A)E(A) measures effectiveness.
Optimization Goal:
Maximize E(A) subject to precision-efficiency tradeoffs\text{Maximize } E(A) \text{ subject to precision-efficiency tradeoffs}Maximize E(A) subject to precision-efficiency tradeoffs
Adaptive Optimization: The system continuously seeks to improve E(A)E(A)E(A) by adjusting processes.
6. Dynamic Evolution of Mathematical Models6.1. Evolutionary Algorithms and Processes
Models evolve through:
Adaptive Learning: Incorporating new data and feedback.
Testing Variations: Trying different model configurations to see which performs best.
6.2. Handling Inconsistencies: The "BUG" Theory
Bug Detection and Learning:
Detection: Identifying discrepancies between expected and actual outcomes.
Adjustment: Modifying processes to correct bugs, akin to an infant learning from mistakes.
Adaptive Thresholds for Bugs:
Sensitivity Adjustment: The system adapts its sensitivity to inconsistencies based on their impact on effectiveness.
7. Human Cognition Modeling7.1. Cognitive Structures in Mathematics
Mathematical constructs mimic cognitive processes, including:
Pattern Recognition: Identifying regularities in data.
Adaptive Learning: Adjusting understanding based on new experiences.
7.2. Subjectivity and First-Person Perspective
Subjective Experience Modeling: Incorporating individual perspectives into processes.
Adaptive Preferences: Preferences evolve based on outcomes and feedback.
8. Application in Artificial Intelligence8.1. Constructing Artificial Consciousness
AI systems use DIKWP mechanisms to:
Learn Adaptively: Continuously improve through testing and validation.
Balance Tradeoffs: Manage precision and efficiency to achieve goals effectively.
8.2. Semantic AI Systems
Contextual Understanding: AI interprets data within semantic contexts, adjusting interpretations based on feedback.
Adaptive Responses: AI modifies its actions based on the effectiveness of previous actions.
9. Examples and Case Studies9.1. Example: Adaptive Learning in Semantic Data Processing
Scenario: An AI assistant learning to understand user commands.
Data Acquisition: Collecting voice commands with semantic annotations.
Testing Interpretations: Trying different interpretations to see which yields the desired outcome.
Feedback Evaluation: User responses provide feedback on correctness.
Adjustment:
Precision-Efficiency Tradeoff: Balancing detailed language parsing with response time.
Effectiveness Optimization: Adjusting parsing depth to maximize user satisfaction.
9.2. Example: Tradeoff Management in Purpose-Driven Optimization
Problem: Developing a recommendation system for online shopping.
Purpose: Maximize user engagement and sales.
Adaptive Testing:
Testing Recommendations: Presenting different product suggestions to users.
Evaluating Outcomes: Measuring click-through rates and purchases.
Balancing Precision and Efficiency:
Precision: Providing highly personalized recommendations.
Efficiency: Limiting computational resources to ensure quick response times.
Effectiveness Goal: Adjusting recommendation algorithms to maximize sales while maintaining user experience.
10. Conclusion10.1. Summary of Enhanced Mechanisms
The DIKWP Semantic Mathematics framework incorporates adaptive learning mechanisms inspired by infant cognitive development, allowing:
Testing and Validation: Systems test and validate transformations among DIKWP components.
Tradeoff Management: Adjusting precision and efficiency to optimize effectiveness.
Continuous Improvement: Learning from outcomes to refine processes.
10.2. Implications and Future Work
Robust AI Development: Enhanced mechanisms support the creation of AI that can learn and adapt like humans.
Effective Problem-Solving: Balancing tradeoffs leads to more practical and efficient solutions.
Research Opportunities: Further exploration into adaptive mechanisms can refine the framework and expand its applications.
11. References
International Standardization Committee of Networked DIKWP for Artificial Intelligence Evaluation (DIKWP-SC),World Association of Artificial Consciousness(WAC),World Conference on Artificial Consciousness(WCAC). Standardization of DIKWP Semantic Mathematics of International Test and Evaluation Standards for Artificial Intelligence based on Networked Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom-Purpose (DIKWP ) Model. October 2024 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26233.89445 . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384637381_Standardization_of_DIKWP_Semantic_Mathematics_of_International_Test_and_Evaluation_Standards_for_Artificial_Intelligence_based_on_Networked_Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom-Purpose_DIKWP_Model
Duan, Y. (2023). The Paradox of Mathematics in AI Semantics. Proposed by Prof. Yucong Duan:" As Prof. Yucong Duan proposed the Paradox of Mathematics as that current mathematics will not reach the goal of supporting real AI development since it goes with the routine of based on abstraction of real semantics but want to reach the reality of semantics. ".
Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International Universities Press.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press.
Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. Basic Books.
Keywords: DIKWP Semantic Mathematics, Adaptive Learning, Tradeoff Management, Precision and Efficiency, Effectiveness, Infant Cognitive Development, Prof. Yucong Duan, Semantics Integration, Mathematical Modeling, Artificial Intelligence, Human Cognition, Dynamic Mathematics, Purposeful Mathematics.
转载本文请联系原作者获取授权,同时请注明本文来自段玉聪科学网博客。
链接地址:https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1454153.html?mobile=1
收藏