对国际科学计量学与信息计量学学会2003年北京大会一份会议投稿摘要的审理意见（2002年11月4日）
武夷山
REVIEWER REPORT FOR ISSI ONLY (Written comments for the ISSI Selection Panel)
Title: （略）
This does not look like a paper but like a policy recommendations report that a university staff prepared for her or his president. If the number of contributions from China is too small, then it could be considered for acceptation as poster. If, however, there are many better contributions from Chinese authors, then it should be rejected.
REVIEWER REPORT FOR AUTHOR (comments to be made available to authors)
Title: （略）
This paper does not look like an academic paper, but like an internal work report written by a staff to the president. The author could improve the paper in the following way:
Check the quality of all those prize-winning achievements by counting citations of relevant papers involved in the prize-winning projects through CSTPC database produced by the Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China and the China Social Science Citation Index produced by Nanjing University. And survey the prize winners themselves on how they evaluate their own achievements. By comparing their self-assessment with the citations found, the author could learn much more about how they could improve the academic performance of his or her university than what they had done.
转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自武夷山科学网博客。
链接地址：https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-1557-1389030.html?mobile=1
收藏
