博文
马普学会科学史所等机构发起一项学术调查问卷
|||
近日，由德国马克斯普朗克科学史研究所、美国科学史学会、美国技术史学会、欧洲科学史学会、英国科学史学会、美国医学史学会、国际科学史与科技哲学联合会科技史分部等机构联合，在进行一项“读者项目”的学术调查问卷。具体内容如下，请国内科技史研究人员有兴趣者参与。
问卷网址：https://de.surveymonkey.com/r/reader-projct
该问卷调查仅是对应的“英译中”部分，“中译英”部分可能由中科院自然科学史所进行，但具体方式暂时不清楚。
目前的投票结果（仅是第一项学科分部的结果；结果只有填写问卷后才可以看到）：
The disciplines of the history of science, medicine, and technology are rethinking themselves in global terms. In order to widen the scope of both subject matter and scholarly discussion, the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, in collaboration with the History of Science Society, the American Association for the History of Medicine, the British Society for the History of Science, the Division of the History of Science and Technology of the International Union of History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, the European Society for the History of Science and the Society for the History of Technology, proposes a pilot project: a two-volume, multi-language reader that will translate into Chinese ten influential historical articles or book chapters on science, technology, or medicine published in English during the last twenty-five years (since 1990) on any topic and epoch in our fields. The reader will be published by Edition Open Access, in conjunction with a renowned Asian academic publishing house, and will be made available both online and by print on demand. The companion volume will translate into English an analogous selection of articles in Chinese chosen by our colleagues in those countries, into English. If this trial project is successful, we hope to expand it to include other regions and languages.
We’d like to ask your help in choosing the articles to be translated from English into Chinese: what article would you recommend most heartily to colleagues, students, or anyone interested in our field? We’ve included a drop-down menu of some of the major journals in our field to suggest the range of possibilities, but the list makes no pretense of being exhaustive; please feel free to nominate articles published elsewhere (under the “Other” rubric, including book chapters).
Nominations of articles may be submitted until December 15, 2015, on a one-person, one-vote basis for each field. Each individual can actually make three nominations—one each for history of science, history of medicine, and history of technology. An editorial committee for the reader, with representatives from each of the sponsoring societies, will review the results and make the final selection.
We’d like to ask your help in choosing the articles to be translated from English into Chinese: what article would you recommend most heartily to colleagues, students, or anyone interested in our field? We’ve included a drop-down menu of some of the major journals in our field to suggest the range of possibilities, but the list makes no pretense of being exhaustive; please feel free to nominate articles published elsewhere (under the “Other” rubric, including book chapters).
Nominations of articles may be submitted until December 15, 2015, on a one-person, one-vote basis for each field. Each individual can actually make three nominations—one each for history of science, history of medicine, and history of technology. An editorial committee for the reader, with representatives from each of the sponsoring societies, will review the results and make the final selection.
https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-451927-932796.html
上一篇：伯克利购书记
下一篇：如此荒唐！评深圳大学2016年“科学史纲要”教师招聘专业条件
扫一扫，分享此博文
全部作者的精选博文
全部作者的其他最新博文
- • 《中国古代科技生动百科》序
- • 兔年看兔：文物中的兔子
- • 向极地进发
- • 科学发现中的“尤里卡”时刻
- • 老魔鬼与干面包——追忆孙慕天老师
- • 聆听农业的历史足音
全部精选博文导读
相关博文
- • 聚英才 建高地 | 北京理工大学“特立青年学者”全球招聘开启
- • 700年后日本或濒临灭绝？日本学者推算预测：届时或仅剩1名15岁以下孩子
- • [转载]【同位素视角】非英语母语学者如何区分’e.g.’, ‘i.e.’, ‘namely’与‘such as’等混淆难题
- • 美国佐治亚大学等机构学者：刈割策略对Bulldog 805紫花苜蓿+Tifton 85狗牙根混播草地产量及品质的影响
- • 美国堪萨斯州立大学、密苏里大学等机构学者研究成果：土壤水分管理策略和品种多样性对紫花苜蓿产量、营养品质和农场盈利能力的影
- • 德国、捷克草业科学学者长期放牧实验：异质草地斑块中的土壤有机碳储量和地下生物量