lauccy的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/lauccy

博文

吹毛求疵-明显不当的文献引用!

已有 1876 次阅读 2013-3-5 18:48 |个人分类:读文献|系统分类:科研笔记| 吹毛求疵

看文献〔"Herbivory", book edited by Breno Barros and Marcus E. B. Fernandes, ISBN 978-953-51-1052-1, Published: February 27,  Chapter 4: The Study of Herbivory and Plant Resistance in Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems

http://www.intechopen.com/books/herbivory/the-study-of-herbivory-and-plant-resistance-in-natural-and-agricultural-ecosystems〕时读到 "........ The best-studied examples of indirect plant defenses are volatile organic compounds and extrafloral nectaries that facilitate the activities of natural enemies [30].”时看了一下该参考文献 30. J Degenhardt, Indirect defense responses to herbivory in grasses.Plant Physiology200914996102 该文献恰好是全文Free 见 http://www.plantphysiol.org/content/149/1/96.full


该文明确说是“In an effort to review some of the most interesting developments in this field, this article will focus on volatile-mediated defense mechanisms in grasses”,从头到尾都没有提extrafloral nectaries,也没有引用相关文献。

但是前文作者在引用该文时竟然说"........ The best-studied examples of indirect plant defenses are volatile organic compounds and extrafloral nectaries that facilitate the activities of natural enemies [30]."

实在是让我不解!

不知这是不是学术不端!




https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-436384-667421.html


下一篇:生态系统-论生态稳定性的维度
收藏 IP: 210.72.93.*| 热度|

0

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (1 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-18 15:59

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部