Conclusion: A good paper ends with strong clear conclusions. It has been said that the body of a good paper is a “thunderbolt in reverse”: it begins with thunder (introduction) and ends with lightning (conclusions) (Byne, 1998). Conclusions should be linked with the goals of the study, and should be limited to the boundaries of the study. Authors should avoid unqualified statements and conclusions not completely supported by the data. For example, they should not make statements on economic benefits and costs unless their manuscript includes economic data and analysis. Authors should refrain from claiming unjustified priority about the findings. It should be noted that a negative finding could be as important as a positive finding.

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自刘见宝科学网博客。
链接地址：https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-362725-280412.html

上一篇：学会利用资料
下一篇：一个大学教授、审稿专家的写作经验——陆际联