邱敦莲 (汇编) A quality peer-review generally includes these parts: (1) A summary of the research and your overall impression (an overview of the manuscript’s strengths and weaknesses); (2) Evidence and examples (major and minor issues); (3) Other points. 一般来说,一篇高质量的同行评审意 ...
Generally speaking, we should be cautious of inviting reviewers recommended by the authors. In my past experience, many author-recommended reviewers give more positive comments. However, I also see some reviewers give strict and high quality review. So, can we invite the author-recommended rev ...
Generally speaking, we suggest the author list be fixed before the manusript is submitted. However author list can be finally fixed at the final revision. The order of the authors in the list can be changed during the revision period according to the contribution of each author. This way can faci ...
Newly-Released Impact Factors for Five Mountain Science Journals June is a hot month in many parts of the world, it is also a hot month for journal editors and many authors. Impact Factor (IF) is usually released in June. Yesterday I saw many editors' zealotry and excitement when their ...
此段翻译信息来自维基百科词条“Editor in Chief”。 Wikipedia: The responsibilities of Editors in Chief The editor-in-chief heads all departments of the organization and is held accountable for delegating tasks to staff members and managing them. The term is often used at newspapers, m ...
Complaints and appeals投拆与申诉 “Journals should have a clearly described process for handling complaints against the journal, its staff, editorial board or publisher”. This refers to COPE’s Core Practice #3 and it is good advice and might be the only advice you need if all human bein ...