走进平常分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/cosismine 40岁,追求卓越,却走进平常

博文

ISSI2023评审要求

已有 2169 次阅读 2023-1-7 11:51 |系统分类:科研笔记




Contribution of the Submission Please outline briefly the main contribution of this submission.

Awarding of Points Based on Various Criteria

* Quality of Content
10% 

* Quality of Content 10%

 10 - Excellent work and a significant contribution

 08 - Good work, significant

 06 - Solid work

 04 - Weak content

 02 - Only an insignificant contribution

 00 - Questionable work

* Significance for Theory or Practice
10% 

* Significance for Theory or Practice 10%

 10 - Very significant

 08 - Significant

 06 - Not bad

 04 - Low significance

 02 - Only of marginal significance

 00 - Absolutely insignificant

* Originality and Level of Innovativeness
10% 

* Originality and Level of Innovativeness 10%

 10 - Groundbreaking

 08 - A pioneer work

 06 - One step forward

 04 - Better works on the same topic exist

 02 - This has been said several times

 00 - Outdated work

* Thematic Relevance for the "Call for Papers"
10% 

* Thematic Relevance for the "Call for Papers" 10%

 10 - Appropriate to the point

 08 - Definitely relevant

 06 - Close enough

 04 - Relevance is questionable

 02 - Not so relevant

 00 - Definitely unsuitable

* Quality of Presentation
10% 

* Quality of Presentation 10%

 10 - Excellently written

 08 - Well written

 06 - Legible

 04 - Needs some revision

 02 - Requires considerable work

 00 - Not acceptable

Decisive Overall Recommendation

* Overall recommendation
50% 

* Overall recommendation 50%

 10 - Definitely accept (very high quality)

 09

 08 - Probably accept (good quality)

 07

 06 - Lean towards acceptance (borderline quality)

 05

 04 - Lean towards rejection (low quality)

 03

 02 - Probably reject (minor quality)

 01

 00 - Definitely reject (has no merit)

Comments on the Submission

Comments for the Authors Please explain your evaluation in a detailed and clear manner. Point out strengths and weaknesses of the submitted contribution. Please also provide suggestions for improvement and use an objective and constructive writing style.

Familiarity of the reviewer with the topic

* Familiarity of the reviewer with the topic 

* Familiarity of the reviewer with the topic

 10 - Very familiar with the topic, my area of expertise

 08 - Good knowledge

 06 - More or less familiar

 04 - Only marginally familiar

 02 - Not really familiar

 00 - Completely new to me

Information for the program committee

Recommended as Poster 

Recommended as Poster

Do you recommend accepting this submission as poster only? 

Major Revision Required 

Major Revision Required

This submissions requires major rework before it can be accepted. 

Veto Against Acceptance 

Veto Against Acceptance

Do you have major objections against the acceptance of this submission?
Please explain your veto in the internal comments. 

Internal comments These comments are only for the chairs and members of the program committee (PC) and will not be passed on to authors.




https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-215715-1370945.html

上一篇:经济学类期刊
下一篇:[转载]刑法修正案网址
收藏 IP: 111.187.47.*| 热度|

2 杨正瓴 宁利中

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (2 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-29 14:55

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部