科学网—何毓琦的留言板

IP: 210.73.10.* [18]陈安 2008-8-15 11:01

怕您在回复里看不到，就在您的宝地再重新贴一下回复您的主要内容。

1，在很多学科上，质量第一，数量基本不应该作为一个参照标准。如数学之类，只要解决了一个大问题，即便是2页的论文，也比50篇论文要来的重要。但是有些学科稍有不同，可能需要质量与数量并重，例如我现在从事的应急管理研究，需要不断地说、不断地写。
2，体育完全不同于科学，科学还是有些传统的东西需要坚持，体育除了美之外，也许更强调的重复和力，而后两者，尤其是重复，是可以通过不断地练弄出效果来的。但是这样简单的道理我们的科学界的领导们却很奇怪地不知道，觉得集中钱和人，就能干出“科学”成果——科学与技术甚至都有很大不同。
3，说到省去的100字，主要还是读者们喜欢看的东西具备一些特性，不见得认真的思考是大家关注的，更多哗众取宠的东西反而是大家喜欢的，科学网作者读者们怕也很难例外。如果我把自己关于突发事件和应急管理的一套的机理体系科普式地写出来，也会有意思，也许还能对其他问题有所启发呢，但是一定没人看，或者看的人在2位数以下。

IP: 59.68.77.* [17]甘永超 2008-6-9 12:13

文献 Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri, Al F. Kracklauer, Katherine Creath. 《The Nature of Light: What Are Photons?》 A self-consistent picture of wave-particle duality of light, Proc. of SPIE, Vol. 6664, (2007), 666407 所设计的判决性实验：让一束632.8nm的氦氖激光与一束100eV的单能电子在真空中对撞并精确测量其散射光的波长，以比较经典条件下光的量子理论与经典电磁理论究竟哪一个更为精确。这是一个欧美的博士研究生就可以完成的判决性实验，希望您能从中牵线搭桥。我期待着该实验的结果并看好它的科学价值。

博主回复：I am sorry but this is not my field or expertise. I can do nothing about your comment.

IP: 59.68.77.* [16]甘永超 2008-6-8 15:17

此留言已被科学网删除！

IP: 219.234.135.* [15]王应宽 2008-5-19 12:45

感谢何教授赐教，言简意赅，很受启发。

我是否可以把您的解释对应到中文词语的理解？即试验-test,旨在审查和验证预知的结论、参数、性能等；实验-experiment，探索、发现未知规律等。

再次感谢！祝您健康长寿！

王应宽

博主回复：对.但是我觉得试验是experiment, 实验是test.

IP: 124.42.119.* [14]王应宽 2008-5-17 16:44

尊敬的何教授：经常拜读您的博文，钦佩您的为人为学，受益良多。非常感谢！

我是期刊编辑，今有一问题请教。我们经常在论文中发现作者对“试验”和“实验”两词混用，但又不便简单的统一。英文中是否有这两个词所对应的表达？Experiment与test在表示试验时是否有区别？不知您如何区分？望不吝赐教。

王应宽 email:wangyk@agri.gov.cn

博主回复：This is my interpretation:
"Experiment" means that I am taking certain action and observe the outcome with no preconcevied idea what the outcome will be. I am 试一试
"Test" means that I am taking certain action and observe the outcome with preconcevied idea what the outcome will be - yes or nbo, good or bad. I am 审查 the outcome.
Hope this helps.

IP: 159.226.151.* [13]刘玉平 2008-5-17 14:00

名人的义举应当受关注，普通人的爱心更应获褒扬！

苍天无情人有情，一方有难八方援！——抗震救灾倡议书
http://www.sciencenet.cn/blog/user_content.aspx?id=25440

IP: 124.115.220.* [12]wang521wgp 2008-5-8 10:29

何老师好，以前看到过您的文章，今天刚进来就看到您的博客，就进来看看了！！希望以后能经常看到您的文章

IP: 168.160.17.* [11]武夷山 2008-4-22 10:30

何老：您能谈谈中国人的思维方式对于您从事科研的影响吗？无论是正面影响还是负面影响。
武夷山
博主回复：我没有仔细考慮过这个问题.但是我從十五岁就离家一个人在国外生活对我喜欢或者不怕问新的问题大概有些关係. 大家都说过: 中国教育及考试制度只注重回答问题而不训練創造问题.
还有一点个人愛好 -- 任何解答我喜欢 "简与巧" 不赞成 "繁及难". (记得小时候学平面几何有一个出名的难题叫 "九点圆". 美国学生从來没有聽过.)

IP: 210.73.4.* [10]王铮 2008-2-7 10:40

众维鱼鱼，溱溱科网，贺我良师，尔牧来思；

桃之夭夭，烁烁其华，贺我益友，万象更新。

IP: 219.143.144.* [9]王海辉 2008-1-1 07:50

Dear Prof. He:
Happy new year~

IP: 96.233.120.* [8]何毓琦 2007-12-12 05:28

Research paper is a record of past accomplishment. A reseaqrch proposal deals with future potential. Need I say more?

IP: 218.82.246.* [7]陆绮 2007-12-11 16:18

Dear Prof. Ho,
Now I am confused with the difference between writing a research proposal and writing an article. Could you please provide some advice on 'How to write a convicing research proposal'.What should be emphasized in an research proposal and what mistakes should be avoided ?
Thank you very much!

Qi

IP: 96.233.120.* [6]何毓琦 2007-12-8 19:56

Please understand that I am here to provide general advice only. I cannot give individual replies as an advise columnist nor am I an expert in everything. If I respond to every request, I'll have no time to do anything.
You must approach you teacher or friends and try to solve your problem on your own.

IP: 222.26.24.* [5]桂耀荣 2007-11-5 12:01

何教授，我一直关注您的博客，我看到你的公告栏写的：
请用中或英文反应都可以
请勿转载
允许链接
谢谢！
www.hrl.harvard.edu/~ho
其中反应是指什么呢？是指反映情况吗？如果是的话，是不是应该把“反应”改写成“反映”呢？
博主回复：Dear Yaoronggui, By 反应 I mean the english words "feedback or response". I do not mean 反映. Of course my Chinese could be wrong.

IP: 59.66.53.* [4]何毓琦 2007-9-30 17:55

Dear "Nothing" Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. As an author I had no knowledge of the associate editor and the reviewers handling the processing of the paper. Usually a submitted manuscript is assigned by the editor to an associate editor to handle the peer review process based on his/her research areas and expertise. While Professor Guan could have recused himself or insisted to editor Araki that he finds another associate editor, he handled the paper with all appropriate objectivity and complete professionalism. The paper went through two rounds of rigorous reviews and revision (all the correspondences and revisions are available for inspection and scrutiny). . We do agree with you about the appearance of possible conflict of interest and would like to suggest the editor and the associate editor to pay more attention to this issue in the future Since you did not reveal your identity, we cannot thank you personally for bringing this matter to the attention of the public. However, if you are not satisfied, you may take this matter with the Journal AUTOMIATICA directly. Sincerely, Yu-Chi Ho

IP: 121.227.22.* [3]周可真 2007-8-16 00:31

何老师,谢谢您光临"寒舍"!我向来认为何老师是"高人",我又不会英语,只能"望何兴叹"!

IP: .* [2]lkxzj2006 2007-5-12 11:42

我们可以交流吗,请您进入我的人民网强国博客(百度千尺)http://blog.people.com.cn/blog/showblog.jspe?site_id=7826 希望回复.我的信箱:lkxzyyzhaojian@163.com

IP: .* [1]何毓琦 2007-5-10 22:39

There now is an excellent translation of my article on "Life of an academic inb the US" at http://www.sciencenet.cn/html/shownews.aspx?id=179076.

何毓琦的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/何毓琦 哈佛(1961-2001) 清华(2001-date)

留言板

何毓琦

何毓琦的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/何毓琦哈佛(1961-2001) 清华(2001-date)