1论文造假的一个技巧
先通过AI将英文译成中文,然后通过AI把中文再次译成英文。
以便通过创新性审查。
“Abstract”的中文译文是摘要,
通过AI,“Abstract“的英文可以被译为”抽象“
然后通过AI,将”抽象“译成英文,
抽:pumping(抽水)
大象:elephant
于是
“摘要” 被译成“Pumping elephant”。
类似地:
2 学术变成草台班子
上海交通大学杨枫教授:如果学术界是个草台班子,那就一定有草包
3 如此文章撤稿竟然经历数年
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14986-0
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-021-14986-0
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on socio-economic and sustainability
Research Article
Open access
Published: 15 July 2021
Volume 28, pages 68251–68260, (2021)
This article was retracted on 10 January 2025
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1464984.html
大学要求撤稿近两年,两家期刊什么也没做
被大量实验文章实证的现行微波吸收理论错的如此彻底,其逻辑错误无法修复
Nature刚被撤稿!该杰出学者NCB的文章也被撤回|撤稿|文章|研究论文|自噬_手机网易网
“
2015年6月22日,St. Jude儿童研究医院Douglas R. Green团队在Nature Cell Biology(IF=21)在线发表题为“Molecular characterization of LC3-associated phagocytosis reveals distinct roles for Rubicon, NOX2 and autophagy proteins”的研究论文,该研究确定了区分LAP和典型自噬的分子,从而阐明了LAP在应对烟曲霉感染中的重要性。
但是,在2024年3月4日,该文章被撤回,主要原因是数据存在虚假陈述。
”
4 作者看懂了自己引用的文章吗
一方面,颠覆错误的现行理论的文章很难发表,另一方面顶刊发表文章的(低级)错误从来不被发现
有意思的是该文已经被引用42次:
5 不靠谱的同行评审
文章是怎么通过SCI刊物的同行评审的,
论文评审专家的水平?
这样的论文工厂的文章,
如此容易就发表了,
编辑部还要花数年才能决定撤稿,
对于颠覆性创新的稿件几乎没有期刊愿意发表!
对于颠覆性创新的稿件,编辑部几乎是秒拒。
推翻现行微波吸收理论是系列工作,其结果的发表一寸一寸地取得进展
实践反复证明:期刊同行评审很难发现文章中的低级错误,但是能高效阻止新思想的传播
民间科学家(民科)的理论就是错了,他们也是兢兢业业地在那里做自己的学问,
然而论文工厂、买卖论文、垃圾文章,虽然文章内容符合主流理论,
这些文章完全是为了个人目的的弄虚作假,
但是主流权威为了自己的既得利益,对于弄虚作假的文章容忍度很大,
在主流科学家的带动下,整个学术界对民科却是那么不能容忍。
主要原因是民科颠覆主流理论的稿件动了主流权威的蛋糕,
而弄虚作假的文章都必须符合(支持)主流共识才能蒙混过关、
这些弄虚作假的文章因为支持主流权威的理论,
是主流权威愿意看到的文章,因此主流科学家不会对这种文章挑刺。
但是有一点是值得文章挂名作者注意的,
论文工厂只管挣钱,文章出了问题最后还得挂名作者负责,
论文工厂不用负责,所以论文工厂出的论文肯定是没有价值的垃圾文章。
审稿人不会对文章负责、编辑不会对论文负责、编辑部不会对文章负责、期刊不会对文章负责、出版社不会对文章负责,
对文章负全责的是文章挂名的作者。
但是对于发表这种垃圾文章的挂名作者,也不在乎负不负责的问题。
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-025-35926-2
Retraction Note: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on socio-economic and sustainability
The Editor-in-Chief and the Publisher have retracted this article. An investigation by the Publisher found a number of articles, including this one, with a number of concerns, including but not limited to compromised peer-review process, inappropriate or irrelevant references, containing nonstandard phrases or not being in scope of the journal.
Based on the investigation's findings, the Editor-in-Chief no longer has confidence in the results and conclusions of this article.
The authors have not responded to correspondence from the Publisher about this retraction.
文中引用的参考文献更是混乱不堪
例如在探讨疫情期间经济活动变化时,引用了诸如无线网络传感器、人脸 识别、移动云计算等领域的文献,这些文献与新冠疫情下的社会经济研究 主题毫无关联。
6 该文有充足项目经费,有足够经费发表开放存取版权的文章
作者是很有能量的(主流科学家称之为有组织项目实施的能力):
申请书天花乱坠,成果一地鸡毛, 科学研究不是深度挖掘根本不存在的关系Funding
1. Heilongjiang Provincial Education Science Planning Office’s Special Project “Research on the Strategy for the Prevention and Control of the Epidemic in the Context of the COVID-19”: Law Popularization Education Research on the Rule of Public Health Rule of Law in Institutions and Universities under Public Health Emergencies, No. GJE1320136
2. Key topics of Heilongjiang Education and Science “13th Five-Year Plan” in 2018: Practical Research on the Innovative Talent Training Mechanism of Heilongjiang Higher Medical Colleges, No. GBB1318076.
3. Heilongjiang Economic and Social Development Key Research Project Base: Research on the Legal Culture Construction of Traditional Chinese Medicine under the Context of the Traditional Chinese Medicine Law, No.: JD2017021.
4. Heilongjiang Provincial University Basic Scientific Research Business Fees Research Project: Research on the Effective Mechanism of the Integration of Outstanding Traditional Chinese Culture into the Ideological and Political Education of Universities, No. 2018-KYYWF-0594.
5. Heilongjiang Philosophy and Social Science Research Project: Research on Intellectual Property Protection of New Fields and New Business Innovation Achievements, No.: 19FXB039.
6. Heilongjiang Philosophy and Social Science Research Project: Research on Labor Employment and Social Security for People with Mental Disabilities in Heilongjiang Province, No. 17GLB026.
7. Daqing Campus of Harbin Medical University “In-School Scientific Research Fund”: Legal Research on the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. DQXN201612.
8. Special topics for the study of the integration of outstanding traditional culture into ideological and political courses on the Daqing campus of Harbin Medical University: the integration of excellent traditional culture into ideological and political courses, the enhancement of cultural consciousness and self-confidence, number: DQCTWH201801.
9. Special Research Project on the Integration of Excellent Traditional Chinese Culture into Thought and Administration Courses on Daqing Campus of Harbin Medical University: Research on the Effective Mechanism of the Integration of Chinese Excellent Traditional Culture into College Thought and Political Science Courses, No. DQCTWH201802.
10. Sichuan Provincial Philosophy and Social Sciences Key Research Base Sichuan Medical and Health Law Research Center 2016 Project: Research on Labor Rights Protection for People with Mental Disabilities in Northeast China, No. YF16-Y02.
11 Key project of Daqing philosophy and social science planning research: research on the construction of healthy Daqing, number: DSGB2019035.
--------------
在引起我们注意到一些图像违规问题后,作者撤回这篇文章,包括但不限于以下内容:
在图1f中,Control siRNA和WWTR1-AS1 siRNA面板之间似乎有部分重叠;
在图6b中,WT-KO和KO-WT小鼠看起来非常相似;
在图6d中,WT-KO和KO-WT面板之间似乎有部分重叠;
在图7a中,GMB192和GMB925下最左边的图像看起来非常相似;
在图7d中,所有四个面板之间似乎有部分重叠;
在图7f中,第3周DHX抑制剂+ TMZ的第4和第6组看起来非常相似;
在扩展数据图6h中,DMSO和DHX抑制剂作用下的图像非常相似;
在扩展数据图8d中,面板PE-A和扩展数据图8e中,面板WT-KO看起来非常相似。
作者将图像重叠和相似归因于人为错误。然而,鉴于错误的数量,他们对研究的可靠性失去了信心,因此希望撤回这篇文章。作者对这些错误深表遗憾,并真诚地向社区道歉。所有作者同意此次撤稿。
该文章被选为封面文章
iNature对于该文章所有的图片进行了检测(蛋白印迹除外),除了撤稿声明所有的图片重复外,还额外发现了其他2对图片重复使用。
对所有图片进行检测,iNature发现文章内11对图片出现重叠:其中9对撤稿声明提到;另外图7A-25及7A-26,7F-13及7F-6是额外发现的图片重复。
=============
Environmental Science And Pollution Research
Environmental Science And Pollution Research_JCR分区_首页
北大教授乔晓春:高被引论文并不代表高质量论文
转载本文请联系原作者获取授权,同时请注明本文来自刘跃科学网博客。
链接地址:https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1470032.html?mobile=1
收藏