关键词

eLife被预警

SCI：你不要SCI，就取消你的SCI

饶毅祝贺eLife退出SCI

================

突发！中国科学院一区期刊 eLife 被 on hold！霸气回应：“从不想要影响因子”|学术|科学|论文|science_网易订阅

睿唯安扼杀了人们利用开放科学原则改进出版和同行评审的努力，试图定义学术出版规则。虽然此前 eLife 的影响因子达到 6.4，但 eLife 表示，他们既不支持影响因子这样模糊的期刊评价指标，也从不想要影响因子。 

Billed as an experiment, eLife’s managers said at the time they hoped the model would alleviate a variety of dysfunctions besetting scientific publication, including long delays and a lack of transparency. Another goal was to challenge the dominance of the IF as a quality marker, which they say is unfit and unreliable for that purpose and fosters an overreliance on a few selective journals with high scores; at the time, eLife’s had a relatively high 6.4 IF. Despite the critiques of the metric, Pattinson said eLife had held discussions with Clarivate since last year arguing for keeping the journal on Clarivate’s Master Journal List. He called Clarivate’s suspension “an overreach,” adding “this feels like an attempt to define the rules of academic publishing, and I have a real concern that a large corporation such as Clarivate is doing that. It feels to me something that should be very much community-led.”

================

https://www.163.com/dy/article/JFRJ81JO0553T4Y3.html

eLife期刊被预警影响SCI，致中国论文减少50%，饶毅发文祝贺主编|学术|sci_网易订阅

eLife期刊中国投稿量的腰斩；是很多学术不端被曝光的结果，也是国家自然科学基金委对不端行为加大处理力度的结果；最终形成了闭环。根本原因是国内在生医领域产生了大量的论垃圾论文；还被期刊发表了，影响非常坏！

特别关心sci的学者，通常是不是关心科研的人。这话说得非重了，等于指着一些人的鼻子在骂了；这样的话可能也只有饶毅才敢说！

https://www.science.org/content/article/web-science-index-puts-elife-hold-because-its-radical-publishing-model

Web of Science index puts eLife ‘on hold’ because of its radical publishing model | Science | AAAS

The Web of Science, a leading bibliometric indexing service, yesterday suspended the journal eLife from its listings because its novel publishing model adopted last year—which includes public peer review but no final decision on whether a manuscript is accepted or rejected—conflicts with the Web of Science’s standards for assuring quality.

硬刚到底！科睿唯安官宣：将取消eLife影响因子！eLife期刊发言人称，“不支持影响因子，也不想要影响因子。”_Science_评审

突发！科睿唯安官宣：将取消eLife影响因子！|论文|拒稿|pnas|elife_网易订阅

顶级期刊被 On hold，官方连夜回应，下一个会是谁？

仅凭发表本身不足以作为衡量有效性的信号和指标。期刊名称或其影响因子几乎不能说明任何一篇研究文章的质量。相反，我们创建了一个模型，可以审查、评估和直接参与研究，而无需依赖替代指标。」

面对期刊编辑们的批评和举措，eLife 主编 Michael Eisen 并未沉默应对，而是在网上公开进行反击。不仅如此，Eisen 还接受了 Nature 的采访，并表示「这些编辑们反对 eLife 新发表模式的根本原因是功成名就的科学家不想改变一个为他们精心打造并使他们受益的系统」。

科睿唯安宣布：将不再赋予中国科学院一区期刊 eLife 影响因子_腾讯新闻

中国科学院一区知名期刊被Web of Science预警，期刊回应称“从不想要影响因子”|学术|科学|索引|science_网易订阅

崩溃！顶级期刊eLife被On hold！-中国科技期刊发展论坛专题页

中国科学院一区知名期刊被Web of Science预警，期刊回应称“从不想要影响因子”｜科研圈日报_腾讯新闻

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自刘跃科学网博客。

链接地址：https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1462809.html?mobile=1

收藏

分享