1 问题的提出
在期刊同行评审中,主流科学家为了维护自己已经取得的名利而极力阻止颠覆主流理论的稿件发表,为了自己的一己私利,阻碍科学的进步,是比“图片误用”更加恶劣的学术不端。
这种学术不端,涉及大多数人犯错误,涉及的主流科学家的人数众多;
做出颠覆性创新的是少数人;
这种学术不端,涉及多数人。
----------------------
对于大多数主流权威犯的浅显而严重的错误视而不见是现代科学界的一个严重问题
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1424805.html
在科学上,多数人的错误(无论是学术上的还是学术道德上的),能不能纠正
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1422831.html
--------------
“some scientists wondered how a questionable line of research persisted for so long … experts were just too timid to take a stand.”
Harvard calls for retraction of dozens of studies by noted cardiologist, New York Times, http://www.staradvertiser.com/2018/10/16/news/harvard-calls-for-retraction-of-dozens-of-studies-by-noted-cardiologist/ . 16 Oct 2018
-----------------------
Peer Review Antagonist - Peeref
“A considerable number of individuals are inclined to align with authority, seemingly believing that this aligning somehow validates their own greatness.”
---------------------------
学术圈某种意义上像是个派系林立的“江湖”,学术权威如同“教主”一样,普通学者没有力量反抗其观点。 随着发表的错误论文越来越多,跟风研究的越来越多,大家都成了既得利益者,就默许了这些错误的观点继续流传下去。———— 科技日报,2018-10-18 第01版:今日要闻,骗了全世界十余年 干细胞“学术大牛”走下神坛https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1614619477235832974&wfr=spider&for=pc
https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1614619476870888302
https://www.rmzxb.com.cn/c/2018-10-18/2193148.shtml
In a certain sense, the academic community resembles a faction-ridden "martial arts world," where academic authorities wield power akin to "sect leaders," and ordinary scholars lack the strength to challenge their viewpoints.
As the number of erroneous papers being published increases and more researchers follow the trend, everyone becomes a beneficiary, tacitly allowing these incorrect viewpoints to continue propagating. — Science and Technology Daily, 2018-10-18, Page 01: Today's Headlines, Deception Spanning Over a Decade: Academic "Masters" in the Field of Stem Cells Fall from Grace
---------------------
科学史表明,因为涉及多数人犯罪、涉及重量级权威犯罪,这种犯罪科学史上反复出现,是一直没能解决的大问题。
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1421220.html
历史反复告诫我们:科学界是一个保守的体系,科学家并不愿意接受新思想,但是学术界从来没有从中吸取教训
“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it”
M. Planck, Scientific Autobiography and Other Paper, William & Norgate, London, 1950, pp. 33 -34.https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/407998797
https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/363487648。
======================================================
2 案例
已经有相当数量的文章发表在不同的有影响的期刊上,从不同视角推翻现代微波吸收理论体系。但是这个反对理论主要只有一个课题组在坚持,绝大多数主流科学家对反对理论视而不见,置之不理,继续在各级各类刊物坚持错误理论,根本不提及有反对理论这回事。这个问题包括顶级期刊。
最新顶刊现行微波吸收理论文章和低级别刊物反对文章之间的比较(让历史做最终的裁决)
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1424431.html
从反对文章被下载和被浏览的数值,可以看出大多数该领域的研究人员(包括作者和审稿人)都已经知晓反对理论的存在。
Liu Y, Liu Y, Drew MGB. A theoretical investigation of the quarter-wavelength model — part 2: verification and extension. Physica Scripta 2022 , 97(1) : 015806. 【445 Total downloads】
Liu Y, Liu Y, Drew MGB. A theoretical investigation on the quarter-wavelength model — part 1: analysis. Physica Scripta 2021 , 96(12) : 125003. 【373 Total downloads】
Liu Y, Zhao K, Drew MGB, Liu Y. A theoretical and practical clarification on the calculation of reflection loss for microwave absorbing materials. AIP Advances 2018 , 8(1) : 015223. 【4,767 Pageviews,1,414 PDF Downloads】
Liu Y, Drew MGB, Li H, Liu Y. A theoretical analysis of the relationships shown from the general experimental results of scattering parameters s11 and s21 – exemplified by the film of BaFe12-iCeiO19/polypyrene with i = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6. Journal of Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy 2021 , 55(3) : 197-218. 【206 Views】
Ying Liu, Michael G. B. Drew, Yue Liu, A physics investigation on impedance matching theory in microwave absorption film—Part 1: Theory, Journal of Applied Physics, 2023, 134(4), 045303, DOI: 10.1063/5.0153608,【267 Pageviews,129 PDF Downloads】
Ying Liu, Michael G. B. Drew, Yue Liu, A physics investigation on impedance matching theory in microwave absorption film—Part 2: Problem Analyses, Journal of Applied Physics, 2023, 134(4), 045304, DOI: 10.1063/5.0153612,【175 Pageviews,93 PDF Downloads】
但是,应用现行微波吸收理论的文章继续在各级各类期刊上大量发表,几乎没有文章提及反对观点。
是反对观点不重要吗?
因为反对理论涉及主流科学家们发表的文章是不是正确,主流科学家没有理由置之不理;
当有反对理论出现后,主流科学家在其发表的文章中必须说明他们为什么继续使用主流理论而不考虑反对理论。
是反对文章不值得考虑吗?
反对文章发表在Journal of Applied Physics,Physica Scripta,Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials,Materials Chemistry and Physics, Physica B: Condensed Matter, Applied Physics A等有影响的严肃期刊上,而且有相当数量的反对文章发表。
的确,主流理论继续发表在更多的期刊上,而且很多发表在顶级刊物上;但这不是对反对理论置之不理的理由。
最新顶刊现行微波吸收理论文章和低级别刊物反对文章之间的比较(让历史做最终的裁决)
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1424431.html
关键问题是:
那么多的主流理论继续发表,
其中很多作者或审稿人已经知晓反对理论;
因为相当多数的领域内研究人员都知晓了反对理论。
在这种情况下大量发表对反对理论置之不理的主流理论文章涉及严重的学术不端。
作者为了文章能发表而故意不提反对理论是学术不端,是比“图片误用”更恶劣的学术不端;
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1424647.html
为了冲淡自己以前发表的错误文章,审稿人鼓励别人继续发表错误文章,是比“图片误用”更恶劣的学术不端;
对于大多数主流权威犯的浅显而严重的错误视而不见是现代科学界的一个严重问题
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1424805.html
在科学上,多数人的错误(无论是学术上的还是学术道德上的),能不能纠正
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1422831.html
Ethical problems in academic peer review
https://www.peeref.com/hubs/218
-----------------
这个案例说明,现在相当多的主流科学家(包括主流权威)都是学术混混,他们只看期刊文献,他们看不懂教材,他们讲不明白课程。
-----
(2 封私信 / 41 条消息) 微波吸收材料领域困惑? - 知乎 (zhihu.com)
为什么很多科研很厉害的老师却不擅长教课? - 知乎 (zhihu.com)
------
他们没有水平判断文章的学术价值,
他们只会根据文章发表期刊的等级判断文章的价值,
他们只会根据拿到的项目经费判断研究人员的研究水平;
他们评审学士、硕士、博士论文只会挑挑格式错误和错别字;
-----
对于大多数主流权威犯的浅显而严重的错误视而不见是现代科学界的一个严重问题
一个鼓吹创新、蔑视继承的时代是标新立异、不承认他人工作的时代
====================================================
Ying Liu, Yue Liu, Drew MGB. Review: Clarifications of concepts concerning interplanar spacing in crystals with reference to recent publications. SN Applied Sciences (非SCI刊物) 2020 , 2(4) : 755.
【8036 】
Received 08 October 2019, Accepted 12 March 2020, Published 25 March 2020
---
So far, Altmetric has seen 8 X posts from 8 X users, with an upper bound of 96,362 followers.
“Keeping this in my back pocket for the next time someone asks “but why do we have to learn theory?” #compsci #gradschool”
“Lacking interest in fundamental theory can lead to problems in academic honesty and mistakes in publications, originating from the fact that researchers are, perhaps necessarily, too eager for the next publication.”
---
文章背景:
一个SCI(二区)晶体学国际刊物的副编辑,国际晶体学会的数学与理论分会创始人和首任主席,竟然在大学基本晶体学原理上犯了一大堆错误。
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0889311X.2017.1339034
Received 30 May 2017, Accepted 02 Jun 2017, Published online: 18 Jun 2017
Massimo Nespolo obtained his MSc in Chemistry from the University of Torino, Italy, and his DrSc in mineralogy from the University of Tokyo, Japan. After a post-doctoral experience at the National Institute of Materials Science, Tsukuba, Japan, he obtained the position of Professor at the Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France. He is the founder and former chair of the Commission on Mathematical and Theoretical Crystallography of the International Union of Crystallography. His research interests concentrate on twinning and modular structures and their group-theoretical description.
==================
3 附录
3.1 学术道德问题的链接:
Ethical problems in academic peer review - Peeref
The Accepted Theories Have Been Overturned - Peeref
Yue Liu – Kudos: Growing the influence of research (growkudos.com)
对于大多数主流权威犯的浅显而严重的错误视而不见是现代科学界的一个严重问题
在科学上,多数人的错误(无论是学术上的还是学术道德上的),能不能纠正
--------------
3.2 期刊的同行评议
破除论文“SCI至上”:[历史] 艾萨克·牛顿斗不过“同行评议”!
Zenas 公理:阿加西教授(Joseph Agassi)于1980年代?
=====
3.3 推翻现代微波吸收理论体系的有关链接:
最新顶刊现行微波吸收理论文章和低级别刊物反对文章之间的比较(让历史做最终的裁决)
现代隐身材料(微波吸收)理论中的阻抗匹配系数理论错误了(最新发表的论文)
Questions from Acaudio (with answers attached)
Fundamental theory of microwave absorption for films
现行微波吸收理论混淆了膜和材料的区别(公开的学术擂台,接受挑战)
现代微波吸收领域的理论框架被推翻 - 知乎 (zhihu.com)
The Accepted Theories Have Been Overturned - Peeref
Yue Liu – Kudos: Growing the influence of research (growkudos.com)
==================
3.4 相关的综述
Recent progress of electromagnetic wave absorbers: A systematic review and bibliometric approach,
ChemPhysMater 2 (2023) 197–206
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chphma.2022.10.002
历史上支持主流微波吸收理论的文章的发表数量等:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aly, K.A. Comment on the relationship between electrical and optical conductivity used in several recent papers published in the journal of materials science: materials in electronics. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 33, 2889–2898 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-07496-9
一个教课书水平的错误出现在不同主流期刊、不同研究组的90+篇文章中:
转载本文请联系原作者获取授权,同时请注明本文来自刘跃科学网博客。
链接地址:https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1426310.html?mobile=1
收藏