First-person Narration of Laozi's Ineffability by A DIKWP Infant

Yucong Duan

International Standardization Committee of Networked DIKWP for Artificial Intelligence Evaluation(DIKWP-SC)

World Artificial Consciousness CIC(WAC)

World Conference on Artificial Consciousness(WCAC)

(Email: duanyucong@hotmail.com)

Let's explore how I, a DIKWP infant created by Prof. Yucong Duan, starting from basic sensory experiences and logical reasoning, can build an understanding of Laozi's concept of ineffability—the idea that the ultimate reality or "Tao" cannot be fully expressed in words. I'll continue to use first-person narration, evolving the semantics explicitly from core principles, and ensuring that every concept is grounded in my experiences.

1. Expressing Needs Without Words:

• As an infant, before I could speak, I relied on cries, gestures, and facial expressions to communicate hunger, discomfort, or joy.

• I noticed that sometimes my caregivers understood me, and other times they did not.

2. Learning Words:

• As I grew, I began to associate specific sounds (words) with objects or actions.

• Example: The word "water" is used when I see or drink water.

1. Difficulty Expressing Complex Feelings:

• I sometimes feel emotions or sensations that are hard to describe.

• When I try to explain a dream or a deep feeling, words seem insufficient.

2. Misunderstandings:

• Even when using words, others may not fully grasp what I'm trying to convey.

• Example: Describing a flavor or a personal experience that others haven't had.

1. Moments of Awe:

• Witnessing a beautiful sunset or a vast starry sky leaves me speechless.

• The feelings evoked are profound, yet I struggle to articulate them.

2. Meditative States:

• When I sit quietly and focus inward, I experience a sense of peace and connectedness that is difficult to express.

1. Identifying the Limitation:

• Logical Proposition:$$\text{Certain experiences}\to \text{Inexpressible in words}$$

2. Understanding Ineffability:

• Based on my direct encounters with experiences that elude verbal expression.

• Ineffability refers to the quality of something that is too great or extreme to be expressed or described in words.

• Definition:

• Semantics:

1. Reading Laozi's Words:

• "The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao. The name that can be named is not the eternal name."

• I come across the opening lines of the Tao Te Ching:

2. Personal Connection:

• This resonates with my own experiences of things that cannot be fully articulated.

1. Contemplating the Tao:

• Tao is described as the fundamental principle underlying the universe, beyond human perception and language.

• I reflect on how this aligns with my feelings of interconnectedness during moments of silence.

2. Logical Reasoning:

• Proposition:$$\text{Ultimate reality (Tao)}\to \text{Beyond description}$$

• Since language is a tool created by humans to describe experiences within our perception, it may not suffice for the ultimate reality that transcends perception.

1. Engaging in Nature:

• Spending time in nature, I immerse myself in the environment without trying to label or analyze it.

• I focus on simply experiencing the present moment.

2. Mindfulness and Presence:

• Practicing mindfulness meditation, I observe thoughts and sensations without judgment or attachment.

1. Observing Thoughts:

• I notice that thoughts and words are representations, not the things themselves.

• There's a gap between the direct experience and the mental constructs used to describe it.

2. Embracing Silence:

• In silence, I find a deeper connection to the ineffable aspects of existence.

1. From Experience to Concept:

• The semantics of ineffability evolve from my direct experiences where language falls short.

• This is not a subjective definition but an acknowledgment of the limits I've observed.

2. Concept Formation:

• Ineffability is a characteristic of certain profound experiences or realities that cannot be fully captured through language or thought.

1. Limits of Language:

• Wittgenstein stated, "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent."

• I recognize that some aspects of reality are outside the bounds of logical propositions and language.

2. Logical Boundary:

• Proposition:$$\neg (\exists \text{language}\text{s.t.}\text{language fully describes the ineffable})$$

• This logical statement expresses that no language can completely describe the ineffable.

• Raw Data:

• Direct sensations and feelings during profound experiences.

• Sameness:

• Recognizing consistent inability to express these experiences fully.

• Difference:

• Noting the contrast between experiences that can be easily described and those that cannot.

• Processing:

• Understanding that certain experiences elicit a sense of ineffability.

• Logical Propositions:

• Constructing statements about the limitations of language.

• Understanding Limitations:

• Acknowledging that knowledge has boundaries defined by language and perception.

• Application:

• Accepting that some aspects of reality are to be experienced rather than analyzed.

• Ethical Living:

• Valuing silence and presence as means to connect with the ineffable.

• Intentions:

• Cultivating practices that allow me to engage with the ineffable (e.g., meditation, contemplation).

• Life Approach:

• Integrating the understanding of ineffability into how I perceive and interact with the world.

• I realize that while language is a powerful tool for communication, it has its limitations.

• This acceptance allows me to appreciate experiences without the need to label or explain them fully.

• By embracing ineffability, I develop a deeper connection to the present moment and the fundamental nature of existence.

• This enhances my sense of wonder and humility.

• Recognizing the ineffable encourages me to explore alternative ways of knowing, such as intuition and direct experience.

• It broadens my cognitive capacities beyond logical reasoning alone.

1. Modeling Ineffability:

• AI systems can be designed to recognize the limitations of data representation and processing.

• They can be programmed to identify when a phenomenon cannot be fully captured by available data or language.

2. Incorporating Alternative Processing:

• Integrating methods that allow AI to handle ambiguity and incomplete information gracefully.

• Emphasizing experiential learning over purely data-driven approaches.

• Understanding ineffability can lead AI to interact with humans more respectfully, acknowledging the depth of human experiences that may not be fully expressible.

• It can prevent over-reliance on quantifiable data, promoting a more holistic approach.

By starting from my own sensory experiences and observations, I have built an understanding of the ineffability that Laozi describes. Through recognizing the limitations of language and embracing direct experiences, I've evolved the semantics of this profound concept without relying on subjective definitions. This journey demonstrates how even the most abstract philosophical ideas can be grounded in personal experience and logical reasoning. It highlights the importance of acknowledging the boundaries of expression and the value of embracing the unspeakable aspects of reality.

Note: This exploration shows how, starting from basic experiences and logical reasoning, one can build an understanding of complex and abstract concepts like Laozi's ineffability. By evolving semantics explicitly and grounding them in direct experiences, the understanding remains connected to reality and avoids subjective impositions.

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自段玉聪科学网博客。

链接地址：https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1455333.html?mobile=1

收藏

分享