Prof. Yucong: Human-Centered Mathematics and the "BUG" Theory in DIKWP Semantic Mathematics

Yucong Duan

International Standardization Committee of Networked DIKWP for Artificial Intelligence Evaluation(DIKWP-SC)

World Artificial Consciousness CIC(WAC)

World Conference on Artificial Consciousness(WCAC)

(Email: duanyucong@hotmail.com)

Abstract

This document delves into Prof. Yucong Duan's proposal that mathematics should not be separated from humans to achieve "completeness" or "objectiveness" in the form of essentially human-based "hypotheses" as traditional. Instead, he suggests that mathematics should explicitly acknowledge that human beings are at the center, with human consciousness playing a pivotal role. This perspective is based on Prof. Duan's "BUG" theory, where bugs correspond to various human subjective attainments of "completeness", serving as the basis for proper abstraction. By integrating these concepts into the Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom-Purpose (DIKWP) Semantic Mathematics framework, Prof. Duan advocates for a mathematics that is intimately connected to human cognition and consciousness, facilitating the development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems capable of genuine understanding and consciousness.

Traditional mathematics has long been viewed as an objective discipline, striving for completeness and objectiveness by formulating hypotheses that are, paradoxically, human-based but aim to transcend subjectivity. This approach often involves abstracting mathematical constructs away from human experiences and cognition to achieve universal applicability.

Prof. Yucong Duan's Critique:

• Separation from Humans: Prof. Duan argues that by separating mathematics from humans to achieve objectiveness, traditional mathematics overlooks the inherent subjectivity and cognitive processes that are central to human understanding.

• Human-Centered Approach: He proposes that mathematics should explicitly acknowledge humans as the center, integrating human consciousness and subjectivity into mathematical constructs.

• "BUG" Theory: Central to his proposal is the "BUG" theory, where bugs represent human subjective experiences and the attainment of completeness, serving as the foundation for proper abstraction.

This document aims to:

• Investigate Prof. Duan's proposal in depth.

• Explore how integrating human consciousness and the "BUG" theory into mathematics aligns with the DIKWP Semantic Mathematics framework.

• Examine the implications for mathematical abstraction, AI development, and our understanding of consciousness.

• Highlight Prof. Duan's perspectives and arguments supporting a human-centered mathematics.

• Traditional Approach: Mathematics seeks objectiveness and completeness by formulating hypotheses intended to be universally valid, often abstracting away from human subjectivity.

• Prof. Duan's Viewpoint:

• Inherent Human Basis: Despite aiming for objectiveness, these hypotheses are essentially human-based, as they originate from human thought and reasoning.

• Flawed Separation: Attempting to separate mathematics from human subjectivity ignores the fundamental role of human cognition in mathematical development.

• Misalignment with Reality: Such separation leads to mathematical constructs that do not fully conform to the reality of the world, which includes subjective experiences.

• Acknowledging Human Consciousness:

• Central Role: Mathematics should explicitly acknowledge that human beings and their consciousness are at the center of mathematical constructs.

• Integration of Subjectivity: Incorporating human subjective experiences enriches mathematical models, making them more aligned with real-world phenomena.

• Basis for Proper Abstraction:

• Subjective Attainment of Completeness: Human experiences and the subjective process of attaining completeness are essential for meaningful abstraction.

• Abstraction Rooted in Consciousness: Proper abstraction arises from recognizing and integrating the nuances of human consciousness.

• Definition:

• "BUG" Theory: Prof. Duan's theory posits that bugs correspond to various human subjective attainments of completeness, playing a crucial role in cognitive development and abstraction.

• Role of Bugs:

• Inconsistencies as Catalysts: Bugs, or inconsistencies in reasoning, prompt reflection, adaptation, and growth in understanding.

• Foundation for Abstraction: By addressing and integrating these bugs, individuals achieve higher levels of abstraction and comprehension.

• Implications for Mathematics:

• Dynamic Process: Mathematics becomes a dynamic process that evolves through the identification and resolution of bugs.

• Human-Centric Abstraction: Abstraction is grounded in human experiences and the iterative process of refining understanding.

• Foundation: Constructs mathematics in an evolutionary manner, mirroring human cognitive development.

• Semantics Integration: Prioritizes semantics over abstract forms, grounding mathematical constructs in real-world meanings.

• Key Components:

• Data (Sameness): Recognizing shared attributes or identities.

• Information (Difference): Identifying distinctions or disparities.

• Knowledge (Completeness): Integrating attributes and relationships to form holistic concepts.

• Wisdom and Purpose: Applying knowledge judiciously towards goals.

• Human-Centered Mathematics:

• Prof. Duan's Emphasis: Mathematics should be constructed from a first-person perspective, incorporating human consciousness and subjectivity.

• Alignment with DIKWP: The framework inherently supports a human-centered approach by modeling cognitive development and integrating semantics.

• Role of the "BUG" Theory:

• Cognitive Growth: Bugs represent challenges or inconsistencies that drive cognitive advancement.

• Integration in DIKWP: The framework accommodates the "BUG" theory by acknowledging the importance of inconsistencies in learning and abstraction.

• Subjective Completeness:

• Process-Oriented: Completeness is not an absolute state but an ongoing process influenced by individual experiences.

• Bugs as Milestones: Each bug addressed and resolved contributes to a more complete understanding.

• Abstraction Grounded in Consciousness:

• Iterative Refinement: Abstraction arises from repeatedly confronting and integrating bugs.

• Human Experience: This process is inherently subjective, rooted in personal cognition and consciousness.

• Traditional Abstraction:

• Objective Focus: Seeks to remove subjectivity to achieve generality and universality.

• Separation from Humans: Often abstracts away from human experiences to maintain objectiveness.

• Prof. Duan's Abstraction:

• Human-Centric: Emphasizes that abstraction should be rooted in human consciousness and experiences.

• Dynamic and Evolving: Recognizes that abstraction evolves through the resolution of bugs.

• Subjective Completeness: Acknowledges that completeness is attained through subjective processes.

• Enhanced Relevance:

• Real-World Alignment: Models and abstractions become more applicable to real-world scenarios.

• Richness of Understanding: Incorporates the depth and complexity of human experiences.

• Improved AI Systems:

• Genuine Understanding: AI systems can achieve deeper understanding by modeling human cognitive processes.

• Adaptability: Systems become more adaptable, capable of learning and evolving through identified bugs.

• Human-Like Cognition:

• Modeling Consciousness: By integrating human consciousness and the "BUG" theory, AI systems can better simulate human cognitive processes.

• Subjectivity in AI: Embracing subjectivity allows AI to experience and process information in ways that resemble human consciousness.

• Learning and Adaptation:

• Bug Identification: AI systems can identify inconsistencies in their reasoning, prompting self-reflection and learning.

• Evolution of Understanding: Through addressing bugs, AI systems evolve, enhancing their capabilities and understanding.

• Enhanced Problem-Solving:

• Dynamic Adaptation: AI can adapt to new information and contexts by continuously refining its understanding.

• Human-Centric Interaction: Systems can interact with humans more effectively by sharing similar cognitive processes.

• Ethical Considerations:

• Alignment with Human Values: AI systems grounded in human consciousness are more likely to align with human values and ethics.

• Transparency and Trust: Understanding how AI systems process and resolve bugs enhances transparency and fosters trust.

• Modeling Human Consciousness:

• Complexity: Human consciousness is multifaceted and challenging to model accurately.

• Solution: Employ interdisciplinary approaches, incorporating insights from cognitive science, psychology, and neuroscience.

• Subjectivity Variability:

• Individual Differences: Subjective experiences vary between individuals.

• Solution: Develop flexible models that can adapt to diverse perspectives and experiences.

• Identifying Bugs:

• Detection Challenges: Determining what constitutes a bug in AI reasoning can be complex.

• Solution: Implement robust error detection mechanisms and feedback loops.

• Addressing Bugs:

• Adaptive Learning: Systems must have the capacity to learn from bugs and adjust accordingly.

• Solution: Utilize machine learning techniques that support continual learning and adaptation.

• Maintaining Rigor:

• Scientific Standards: Ensuring that mathematics remains rigorous while integrating subjectivity.

• Solution: Establish clear methodologies for incorporating subjectivity without compromising mathematical integrity.

• Universal Applicability:

• Generalization: Balancing individual subjective experiences with the need for universal principles.

• Solution: Identify commonalities in human cognition that can serve as a foundation for broader applications.

Prof. Yucong Duan's proposal challenges traditional mathematical paradigms by asserting that mathematics should not be separated from humans to achieve completeness or objectiveness. Instead, mathematics should explicitly acknowledge human beings as the center, integrating human consciousness and subjectivity into its constructs. The "BUG" theory plays a crucial role in this framework, positing that bugs correspond to various human subjective attainments of completeness, serving as the basis for proper abstraction.

By embracing this human-centered approach, mathematics becomes a dynamic, evolving discipline that more accurately reflects the reality of the world. This perspective has significant implications for the development of AI and artificial consciousness systems, enabling the creation of systems that can genuinely understand, learn, and adapt in ways that mirror human cognition.

• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Engage experts from mathematics, AI, cognitive science, psychology, and philosophy to refine and expand upon Prof. Duan's proposals.

• Empirical Validation: Develop prototypes and experimental studies to test the practical applications of integrating the "BUG" theory and human-centered abstraction into AI systems.

• Curriculum Integration: Incorporate these concepts into educational programs to foster new generations of mathematicians and AI researchers who embrace human-centered approaches.

• Conferences and Publications: Share findings and progress with the broader academic and professional communities to stimulate discussion and collaboration.

1. International Standardization Committee of Networked DIKWP for Artificial Intelligence Evaluation (DIKWP-SC),World Association of Artificial Consciousness(WAC),World Conference on Artificial Consciousness(WCAC). Standardization of DIKWP Semantic Mathematics of International Test and Evaluation Standards for Artificial Intelligence based on Networked Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom-Purpose (DIKWP ) Model. October 2024 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26233.89445 .  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384637381_Standardization_of_DIKWP_Semantic_Mathematics_of_International_Test_and_Evaluation_Standards_for_Artificial_Intelligence_based_on_Networked_Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom-Purpose_DIKWP_Model

2. Duan, Y. (2023). The Paradox of Mathematics in AI Semantics. Proposed by Prof. Yucong Duan:" As Prof. Yucong Duan proposed the Paradox of Mathematics as that current mathematics will not reach the goal of supporting real AI development since it goes with the routine of based on abstraction of real semantics but want to reach the reality of semantics. ".

3. Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International Universities Press.

4. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

5. Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, Brains, and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417-424.

For further discussion on Prof. Yucong Duan's proposals regarding human-centered mathematics and the "BUG" theory within the DIKWP Semantic Mathematics framework, please contact [Author's Name] at [Contact Information].

Keywords: DIKWP Semantic Mathematics, Human-Centered Mathematics, Prof. Yucong Duan, "BUG" Theory, Subjectivity, Consciousness, Mathematical Abstraction, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Modeling, Semantics Integration.

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自段玉聪科学网博客。

链接地址：https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1454139.html?mobile=1

收藏

分享