Artificial Intelligence DIKWP International Evaluation Standards International Committee Standard Meeting

人工智能DIKWP国际测评标准国际委员会标准会议

Meeting Minutes.

会议纪要

Date: April 29, 2024

日期：2024年04月29日

Conference organization: World Artificial Conscience Association for DIKWP Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence

会议组织：人工智能DIKWP测评国际标准委员会（World Artificial Consciousness Association）

Attendees: Member of the International Standards Committee for DIKWP Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence

参会人员：人工智能DIKWP测评国际标准委员会委员

Summary of core topics and discussions:

核心议题与讨论摘要：

1. Topic optimization and popularization expansion:

Participants pointed out that there are obstacles to the understanding of non professional audiences in the expression of current international evaluation standards, and suggested simplifying the expression to enhance its acceptability within and outside the industry. After brainstorming, the meeting tends to adopt more intuitive and easy to understand expressions, such as using a short horizontal line "-" instead of a dash to connect key elements, and maintaining the use of the DIKWP English abbreviation. At the same time, it is planned to provide a brief explanation of the DIKWP model in the standard document to enhance its popularity. The tentative discussion topic is "Artificial Intelligence Data Information Knowledge Wisdom Purpose(DIKWP) Network Feedback International Evaluation Standard".

1、题目优化与普及性扩展：

与会者指出当前国际测评标准题目的表述对于非专业受众理解存在障碍，并建议简化表述，以提升其在行业内外的可接受度。经过集思广益，会议倾向于采用更直观且易于理解的表述方式，如通过短横线“-”替代顿号来连接关键要素，并保持DIKWP英文缩写的使用，同时计划在标准文档中对DIKWP模型进行简要说明，以增强普及度。通过讨论题目暂定为“人工智能数据-信息-知识-智慧-意图（DIKWP）网馈国际测评标准”。

2. Accurate positioning of evaluation standards:

During the discussion, some members emphasized the importance of clarifying the purpose of the evaluation, that is, whether the evaluation is a specific evaluation of the five dimensions of DIKWP or a comprehensive evaluation using the DIKWP model. Through discussion, a consensus was reached that the question should clearly reflect the core purpose of using the DIKWP model for evaluation and ensure compliance with international standards.

2、测评标准精准定位：

讨论中，部分成员强调了明确测评目的的重要性，即测评是针对DIKWP五个维度的具体评估，还是利用DIKWP模型进行综合评价。通过讨论，达成共识，即题目需清晰反映利用DIKWP模型进行测评的核心目的，并确保符合国际规范。

3. Future orientation and social value:

The meeting delved into the long-term trends in the development of artificial intelligence, emphasizing that evaluation standards should not only adapt to current data and information exchange levels, but also proactively cover higher-level interaction capabilities such as wisdom(value) and purpose recognition, especially for cutting-edge technologies such as strong artificial intelligence (AGI) and embodied intelligence. In addition, it is emphasized that evaluation standards should actively integrate the concepts of "people-oriented" and "community with a shared future for mankind", ensuring that the development of artificial intelligence technology can serve the overall well-being of society and effectively challenge the alignment of artificial value (DIKWP-W) and purpose (DIKW-P).

3、未来导向与社会价值：

会议深入探讨了人工智能发展的长远趋势，强调测评标准不仅要适应当前的数据、信息交互层面，还应前瞻性地涵盖智慧（价值创造）、意图识别等更高级别的交互能力，特别是针对强人工智能（AGI）、具身智能等前沿技术。此外，强调测评标准应积极融入“以人为本”和“人类命运共同体”的理念，确保人工智能技术的发展能够服务于社会的整体福祉，有效应对人工价值（DIKWP-W）对齐与意图（DIKW-P）对齐的挑战。

4. Simplicity of expression and scope of application:

The meeting emphasized the importance of conciseness and universality in content expression. Experts attending the meeting remind that the expression of evaluation standards should strive for clarity and conciseness, avoid unnecessary complexity, ensure that the standards can be widely understood and applied in different types of AI models, different countries and regions, and promote the standardization and standardized development of global AI technology.

4、表述简洁性与适用范围：

针对内容表述，会议强调了简洁性与普遍适用性的重要性。与会专家提醒，测评标准的表述应当力求清晰、精炼，避免不必要的复杂性，确保标准能够在不同类型的AI模型、不同国家和地区间得到广泛理解和应用，促进全球AI技术的标准化和规范化发展。

Suggestions for follow-up actions:

l Based on the discussion results of the meeting, revise the standard title to the final version.

l Add a detailed explanation of the DIKWP model to the standard document to enhance readability and international recognition.

l Considering future development, further explore how to integrate humanistic care and social responsibility into standards, reflecting the principle of "people-oriented".

l Ensure that standard expressions are concise, avoid redundancy, and facilitate understanding and application by people from different backgrounds.

后续行动建议：

l 根据会议讨论结果，修订标准题目为最终确定的版本。

l 在标准文档中加入DIKWP模型的详细解释，增强可读性和国际认可度。

l 考虑到未来发展，进一步探讨如何在标准中融入人文关怀与社会责任，体现“以人为本”原则。

l 确保标准表述精炼，避免冗余，便于不同背景人士理解与应用。

Conclusion of the meeting:

This meeting effectively discussed and determined the basic framework and direction of the international evaluation standard for artificial intelligence DIKWP, clarified the title, purpose, and challenges faced by the standard. The members of the committee unanimously agreed to continue deepening cooperation and promoting the development and promotion of this standard to adapt to and lead the global trend in the field of artificial intelligence.

会议结束语：

本次会议有效讨论并确定了人工智能DIKWP国际测评标准的基本框架与方向，明确了标准的题目、目的、以及面临的挑战。委员会成员一致同意，将继续深化合作，推动该标准的制定与推广工作，以适应并引领全球人工智能领域的发展趋势。

标准归口组织：AGI-AIGC-GPT评测DIKWP（全球）实验室(世界人工意识协会)

The organization for this standard: AGI-AIGC-GPT Evaluation DIKWP (Global) Laboratory (World Artificial Consciousness Association)

编委单位：（不分先后，按首字母排序）

AIII人工智能国际研究院、AGI-AIGC-GPT评测DIKWP（全球）实验室、Blue Edu、北京大学、北京科技大学、北京社科院、北京标准化研究院、成都信息工程大学、重庆警察学院、东莞研华精密制造有限公司、广西师范大学、国家电网、海南大学、海南核电有限公司、海南普适智能科技有限公司、海南省市场监督管理局、海南医学院第二附属医院、华中农业大学、江苏立卓信息技术有限公司、肯思德（珠海）有限公司、辽宁省辽阳市人民检察院、南京警察学院、内蒙古大学、宁波大学、清华大学研究院、山东大学、山西省工业和信息厅、上海航天信息科技研究院、上饶师范学院、深信服公司、世界人工意识协会、世界人工意识大会、太极计算机股份有限公司、西安理工大学、西南政法大学、粤港澳大湾区标准化研究中心、中国标准化研究院标准化理论战略研究所、中国机电一体化技术应用协会、中国信息通信研究院等

The editorial board: (in no particular order, in alphabetical order)

AIII International Research Institute of Artificial Intelligence, AGI-AIGC-GPT Evaluation DIKWP (Global) Laboratory, Blue Edu, Peking University, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing Institute of Standardization, Chengdu University of Information Science and Technology, Chongqing Police College, Dongguan Advantech Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Guangxi Normal University, State Grid, Hainan University, Hainan Nuclear Power Co., Ltd., Hainan Universal Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., Hainan Provincial Market Supervision Administration, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Huazhong Agricultural University, Jiangsu Li Zhuo Information Technology Co., Ltd., Kenside (Zhuhai) Co., Ltd., People's Procuratorate of Liaoyang City, Liaoning Province, Nanjing Police Academy, Inner Mongolia University, Ningbo University, Tsinghua University Research Institute, Shandong University, Shanxi Provincial Department of Industry and Information, Shanghai Aerospace Information Institute of Science and Technology, Shangrao Normal University, Sangfor Corporation, World Artificial Consciousness Association, World Artificial Consciousness Conference, Tai Chi Computer Co., Ltd., Xi'an University of Technology, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Standardization Research Center, China Standardization Institute Standardization Theory Institute of Strategic Studies, China Mechatronics Technology Application Association, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, etc.