||
诡异的SCI论文高引用?一篇Cell论文被撤稿之前有166人次引用
Retraction Notice to: The Chromatin-Remodeling Complex WINAC Targets a Nuclear Receptor to Promoters and Is Impaired in Williams Syndrome
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867412003376
Retraction Notice:
Our paper reported that a chromatin-remodeling complex, WINAC, recruited the unliganded vitamin D receptor to promoters in cooperation with the transcription factor implicated in Williams syndrome, WSTF. The findings provided insights into the coordination between chromatin remodelers and sequence-specific transcription factors and pointed to a role of chromatin remodeling defects in Williams syndrome. We recently identified errors affecting several figure panels where original data were processed inappropriately such that the figure panels do not accurately report the original data. We believe that the most responsible course of action is to retract the paper. We sincerely apologize to the scientific community for any inconvenience that this might cause. The first author, H.K., declined to sign the retraction notice.
Note:
"Shigeaki Kato resigned from his professor position at the University of Tokyo as of the end of March, 2012, taking responsibility of the misconduct. But the first author, Hirochika Kitagawa did not agree with the retraction of the Cell article. (Asahi newspaper, April 5, 2012)"
问题是:1、你如何看待引用这篇文章的文章的质量?2、116篇文章有没有必要全部Retract?
3、你还迷信高引用率么? 4、为什么有如此多的人对一篇造假而成的论文如此钟情?纷纷引用?
Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )
GMT+8, 2024-6-18 08:05
Powered by ScienceNet.cn
Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社