南赫
关于诺贝尔化学奖Xiaowei Zhuang 与 Eric Betzig 争议的官方回复 精选
2014-10-9 07:56
阅读:34640

出于疑惑给诺贝尔奖评奖委员会写了一封信,询问为什么Xiaowei Zhuang没有获奖,没想到很快收到回复。答复中解释:


Dear xxxxx, Please, note that the prize motivation for Dr. Betzig has two aspects. One concerns his theory from 1995 and the other his experimental work 2006 (PALM). You may also note the submission date of his paper, for the record.


所以查了一下投稿日期:

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/313/5793/1642

Science
Vol. 313 no. 5793 pp. 1642-1645
DOI: 10.1126/science.1127344

Received for publication 13 March 2006.

Accepted for publication 2 August 2006.

----------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v3/n10/full/nmeth929.html

Nature Methods - 3, 793 - 796 (2006)
Published online: 9 August 2006; | doi:10.1038/nmeth929

Received 7 July 2006; Accepted 31 July 2006; Published online: 9 August 2006.


确实是Eric Betzig先投的论文,而且有先前的基础工作在里面,权重不同。即使这样也十分为Xiaowei Zhuang惋惜。



相关专题:2014年诺贝尔奖

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权,同时请注明本文来自南赫科学网博客。

链接地址:https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-1311782-834150.html?mobile=1

收藏

分享到:

下一篇
当前推荐数:14
推荐到博客首页
网友评论21 条评论
确定删除指定的回复吗?
确定删除本博文吗?