张江敏
EJP审稿意见
2017-6-30 19:48
阅读:4356

被拒。其实EJP上很多文章也不够pedagogical的。可能编辑确实不好找审稿人,找的是Editorial board member.

======================

Dear Dr Zhang,

Re: "Witnessing a Poincare recurrence with Mathematica" by Zhang, Jiang min; Liu, Yu

Article reference: EJP-102836

Your Paper, submitted to European Journal of Physics, has now been refereed and the referee report(s) can be found below and/or attached to this message.

We regret to inform you that the referee(s) have recommended that your article should not be published in the journal, for the reasons given in the reports. Your manuscript has therefore been withdrawn from consideration.

We would like to thank you for your interest in European Journal of Physics.

Yours sincerely

Stephanie White

On behalf of the IOP peer-review team:  

Dr Ben Sheard - Editor

www.iopscience.org/ejp

Impact Factor: 0.614

We are always looking for ways to improve our service and would appreciate it if you could take five minutes to complete a short survey (https://freeonlinesurveys.com/s/1ydL899J#/) about your experience of submitting to IOP Publishing. All of your feedback is incredibly valuable to us, and we would like to thank you in advance for your help.

REFEREE REPORT(S):

Referee: Editorial Board Member

COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR(S)

I would say that the paper is well written and interesting but not really accessible to the reader of EJP. It would require a substantial pedagogical re-writing to make it interesting for a non-specialist in Hamiltonian systems. Therefore I would suggest to submit the actual manuscript elsewhere.

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权,同时请注明本文来自张江敏科学网博客。

链接地址:https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-100379-1063881.html?mobile=1

收藏

分享到:

当前推荐数:4
推荐到博客首页
网友评论6 条评论
确定删除指定的回复吗?
确定删除本博文吗?