ChaomeiChen的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/ChaomeiChen

博文

Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics

已有 2892 次阅读 2016-10-4 21:10 |个人分类:Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analyt|系统分类:论文交流

Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics (Open Access)上的新发表的文章:

OPINION ARTICLE

Tom Heyman, Pieter Moors and Gert Storms (2016)

On the cost of knowledge: Evaluating the boycott against Elsevier

Front. Res. Metr. Anal. | doi: 10.3389/frma.2016.00007

http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frma.2016.00007/full

......It turns out that a substantial portion of the signatories was either unidentifiable (21%) or hadn’t published in any outlet, to our knowledge, since signing (19%). However, 23% of the signatories did publish in an Elsevier outlet after signing the petition . This number is somewhat higher in Chemistry (29%) compared to Psychology (17%). The remaining 37% indeed published exclusively in non-Elsevier outlets. In other words, 38% of the publishing signatories abandoned their “won’t publish in an Elsevier outlet” commitment (i.e., 23%/(23%+37%)).



http://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-496649-1006723.html

上一篇:知识图谱研讨会视频+讨论区
下一篇:书评:《CiteSpace: A Practical Guide For Mapping Sci 。。》

0

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2021-10-25 13:34

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部