多专家教学成果评价是一个多属性群决策问题，可以提高教学质量。来自山东财经大学和山东电视大学的学者们在期刊 International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems(IJCIS) 上发表了题为“Teaching Performance Evaluation Based on the Proportional Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Prioritized Choquet Aggregation Operator”的文章，研究了基于比例犹豫模糊语言优先Choquet聚合算子的教学成果评价。

[1]  J.Chen,H.Hsieh,Q.Do, Evaluating teaching performance based on fuzzy AHP and comprehensive evaluation approach, Appl. Soft Comput. 28 (2015), 100–108.

[2]  Z.S. Chen, M. Li, W.T. Kong, K.S. Chin, Evaluation and selection of hazmat transportation alternatives: a PHFLTS- and TOPSIS- integrated multi-perspective approach, Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health. 16 (2019), 4116.

[3]  L.Zhou,H.Li,K.Sun,Teaching performance evaluation by means of a hierarchical multifactorial evaluation model based on type-2 fuzzy sets, Appl. Intell. 46 (2016), 34–44.

[4]  M.Kuzmanovic,G.Savic,B.AndricGusavac,D.Makajic-Nikolic, B. Panic, A conjoint-based approach to student evaluations of teaching performance, Expert Syst. Appl. 40 (2013), 4083–4089.

[5]  B. Dutta, Á. Labella, R.M. Rodríguez, L. Martínez, Aggregat- ing interrelated attributes in multi-attribute decision-making with ELICIT information based on Bonferroni mean and its variants, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 12 (2019), 1179–1196.

[6] Á. Labella, R.M. Rodríguez, L. Martínez, Computing with com- parative linguistic expressions and symbolic translation for deci- sion making: ELICIT information, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 28 (2020), 2510–2522.

[7] S.H. Xiong, Z.S. Chen, K.S. Chin, A novel MAGDM approach with proportional hesitant fuzzy sets, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 11 (2018), 256–271.

[8] P. Liu, Y. Wang, Intuitionistic fuzzy interaction hamy mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making, Group Decis. Negot. 28 (2019), 197–232.

[9] P.Liu,W.Liu,ScaledPrioritizedOperatorsBasedontheLinguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers and Their Applications to Multi- Attribute Decision Making, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20 (2018), 1539– 1550.

[10] X.Liang,P.Liu,Z.Wang,Hotelselectionutilizingonlinereviews: a novel decision support model based on sentiment analysis and dl-vikor method, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 25 (2019), 1139–1161.

[11] X. Liang, F. Teng, Y. Sun, Multiple group decision making for selecting emergency alternatives: a novel method based on the ldwpa operator and ld-mabac, Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health. 17 (2020), 2945.

[12] Z.S.Chen,K.S.Chin,Y.L.Li,Y.Yang,Proportionalhesitantfuzzy linguistic term set for multiple criteria group decision making, Inf. Sci. 357 (2016), 61–87.

[13] Z.S.Chen,Y.Yang,X.J.Wang,K.S.Chin,K.L.Tsui,Fosteringlin- guistic decision-making under uncertainty: a proportional inter- val type-2 hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on Hamacher aggregation operators and andness optimization models, Inf. Sci. 500 (2019), 229–258.

[14] R.M. Rodríguez, Á. Labella, G. De Tré, L. Martínez, A large scale consensus reaching process managing group hesitation, Knowl. Based Syst. 159 (2018), 86–97.

[15] J. Huang, X.Y. You, H.C. Liu, S.L. Si, New approach for quality function deployment based on proportional hesitant fuzzy lin- guistic term sets and prospect theory, Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (2019), 1283–1299.

[16] L.A.Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I, Inf. Sci. 8 (1975), 199–249.

[17] L.A.Zadeh,Theconceptofalinguisticvariableanditsapplication to approximate reasoning-II, Inf. Sci. 8 (1975), 301–357.

[18] L.A.Zadeh,Theconceptofalinguisticvariableanditsapplication to approximate reasoning-III, Inf. Sci. 9 (1975), 43–80.

[19] R.M. Rodriguez, L. Martinez, F. Herrera, A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Inf. Sci. 241 (2013), 28–42.

[20] H. Liao, Z. Xu, X.J. Zeng, Hesitant fuzzy linguistic vikor method and its application in qualitative multiple criteria decision mak- ing, Fuzzy Syst. IEEE Trans. 23 (2015), 1343–1355.

[21]  H. Wang, Z. Xu, Total orders of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: definitions, generations and applications, Knowl. Based Syst. 107 (2016), 142–154.

[22]  C. Wei, R.M. Rodriguez, L. Martinez, Uncertainty measures of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26 (2018), 1763–1768.

[23]  S.M. Yu, J. Wang, J.Q. Wang, L. Li, A multi-criteria decision- making model for hotel selection with linguistic distribution assessments, Appl. Soft Comput. 67 (2017), 741–755.

[24]  G. Zhang, Y. Dong, Y. Xu, Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assess- ments, Inf. Fusion. 17 (2014), 46–55.

[25]  M. Grabisch, Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 69 (1995), 279–298.

[26]  R.R. Yager, Prioritized aggregation operators, Int. J. Approx. Rea- son. 48 (2008), 263–274.

[27]  Z.S. Chen, X.L. Liu, R.M. Rodríguez, X.J. Wang, K.S. Chin, K.L. Tsui, L. Martínez, Identifying and prioritizing factors affect- ing in-cabin passenger comfort on high-speed rail in China: a fuzzy-based linguistic approach, Appl. Soft Comput. 95 (2020), 106558.

[28]  P. Liu, Y. Wang, Interval neutrosophic prioritized owa operator and its application to multiple attribute decision making, J. Syst. Sci. Compl. 29 (2016), 681–697.

[29]  P. Liu, Y. Li, J. AntucheviČiene, Multi-criteria decision-making method based on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy prioritised owa operator, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 22 (2016), 453–469.

[30] P. Liu, J. Liu, Some q-rung orthopai fuzzy bonferroni mean oper- ators and their application to multi-attribute group decision mak- ing, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33 (2018), 2341–2363.

[31] M. Sugeno, Fuzzy measure and fuzzy integral, Trans. Soc. Instr. Control Eng. 8 (1972), 218–226.

[32] F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, J.L. Verdegay, A model of consen- sus in group decision making under linguistic assessments, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 78 (1996), 73–87.

[33] R.M. Rodriguez, L. Martinez, F. Herrera, Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20 (2012), 109–119.

[34] Q. Pang, H. Wang, Z. Xu, Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making, Information Sciences, 369 (2016), 128–143.

[35] M. Grabisch, I. Kojadinovic, P. Meyer, A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: applications of the Kappalab R package, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 186 (2008), 766–785.

[36] M. Grabisch, The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 89 (1996), 445–456.

[37] L. Chen, Z. Xu, X. Yu, Prioritized measure-guided aggregation operators, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22 (2014), 1127–1138.[38] X. Wang, E. Triantaphyllou, Ranking irregularities when evaluat- ing alternatives by using some electre methods, Omega. 36 (2008), 45–63.

原文信息

L. Wang, L. Rong, F. Teng, P. Liu, "Teaching Performance Evaluation Based on the Proportional Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Prioritized Choquet Aggregation Operator", International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.210112.001.

扫描二维码，获取英文原文

https://www.atlantis-press.com/journals/ijcis/125951265

关于期刊

Impact Factor: 1.838, CiteScore: 3.59

International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems(IJCIS)是欧洲模糊逻辑和技术学（EUSFLAT）会刊，主要刊载有关应用计算智能各个方面的原创性研究，尤其是针对证明使用了计算智能理论的技术和方法的研究型论文及综述等，由西班牙哈恩大学Luis Martínez Lopez教授和澳大利亚悉尼科技大学路节教授担任共同主编。本刊目前已被DOAJ, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Ei Compendex and Scopus等数据库收录。

Atlantis Press是一家出版科学、技术和医学（STM）内容的全球开放获取出版机构，2006年成立于法国巴黎。现总部位于荷兰阿姆斯特丹，在法国巴黎及中国的北京、郑州和香港设有办事处。我们的使命是通过促进科研界和整个社会更有效地传播和交流知识来支持科学、技术和医学研究的进步。迄今，Atlantis Press的数字内容平台包含超过14万篇开放获取论文供读者免费下载阅读，每年产生数千万下载量。Atlantis Press是施普林格•自然集团的一部分。