什么是alrmetrics？ http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=769813&do=blog&id=716111

学术论文水平度量标准 Article level metrics  http://www.altmetric.com/article-level-metrics.php

在一个人们不断寻找更多方法来衡量产出的学术世界，IF和其他的期刊度量标准是很有价值（虽然并不完善）的工具，但前提是必须使用适宜。包括altmetrics http://www.altmetric.com/article-level-metrics.php在内的一些其他的手段也正在被开发，它们将帮助我们获得对于期刊和文章影响力的更全面的认识。像许多其他的出版商一样，Wiley也在做一些这样的实验，包括参加一个为期六个月的Altmetric测试。此外，NISO最近宣布它将开发Altmetrics的收集和使用标准。

http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=822310&do=blog&id=710231

Wiley Trial Alternative Metrics on Subscription and Open Access Articles

About Altmetric:
Altmetric is a system that tracks the attention that scholarly articles and datasets receive online. It does this by pulling in data from three main sources; Social media like Twitter, Facebook, Google+, Pinterest and blogs, Traditional media and Online reference managers like Mendeley and CiteULike.

Altmetric cleans up and normalizes the data from these sources then makes it available for analysis. A key difference between Altmetric and other social media monitoring services is that Altmetric will disambiguate links to articles: it knows that even though some tweets might link to a PubMed abstract, newspapers to the publisher's site and blog posts to a dx.doi.org link they're all talking about the same paper.

URL:http://altmetric.uservoice.com/

http://as.wiley.com/WileyCDA/PressRelease/pressReleaseId-108763.html

NISO to Develop Standards and Recommended Practices for AltmetricsGrant from Sloan Foundation will fund community-informed effort to standardize collection and use of alternative metrics measuring research impact

Baltimore, MD - June 20, 2013 - The National Information Standards Organization (NISO) announces a new two-phase project to study, propose, and develop community-based standards or recommended practices in the field of alternative metrics. Assessment of scholarship is a critical component of the research process, impacting everything from which projects get funded to who gains promotion and tenure to which publications gain prominence. Since Eugene Garfield's pioneering work in the 1960s, much of the work on research assessment has been based upon citations, a valuable measure but one that has failed to keep pace with online reader behavior, network interactions with content, social media, and online content management. Exemplified by innovative new platforms like ImpactStory, a new movement is growing to develop more robust alternative metrics—called altmetrics—that complement traditional citation metrics. NISO will first hold several in-person and virtual meetings to identify critical areas where altmetrics standards or recommended practices are needed and then convene a working group to develop consensus standards and/or recommended practices. The project is funded through a $207,500 grant from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

"Citation analysis lacks ways to measure the newer and more prevalent ways that articles generate impact such as through social networking tools like Twitter, Facebook, or blogs," explains Nettie Lagace, NISO's Associate Director for Programs. "Additionally, new forms of scholarly outputs, such as datasets, software tools, algorithms, or molecular structures are now commonplace, but they are not easily—if at all—assessed by traditional citation metrics. These are two among the many concerns the growing movement around altmetrics is trying to address."

"For altmetrics to move out of its current pilot and proof-of-concept phase, the community must begin coalescing around a suite of commonly understood definitions, calculations, and data sharing practices," states Todd Carpenter, NISO Executive Director. "Organizations and researchers wanting to apply these metrics need to adequately understand them, ensure their consistent application and meaning across the community, and have methods for auditing their accuracy. We must agree on what gets measured, what the criteria are for assessing the quality of the measures, at what granularity these metrics are compiled and analyzed, how long a period the altmetrics should cover, the role of social media in altmetrics, the technical infrastructure necessary to exchange this data, and which new altmetrics will prove most valuable. The creation of altmetrics standards and best practices will facilitate the community trust in altmetrics, which will be a requirement for any broad-based acceptance, and will ensure that these altmetrics can be accurately compared and exchanged across publishers and platforms."

"Sensible, community-informed, discipline-sensitive standards and practices are essential if altmetrics are to play a serious role in the evaluation of research," says Joshua M. Greenberg, Director of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation's Digital Information Technology program. "With its long history of crafting just such standards, NISO is uniquely positioned to help take altmetrics to the next level."

The first phase of the project will gather two groups of invited experts in altmetrics research, traditional publishing, bibliometrics, and faculty assessment for in-person discussions with the goal of identifying key altmetrics issues and those that can best be addressed through standards or recommended practices. This input will form the basis of two virtual meetings open to the public to further refine and prioritize the issues. Additional community input will be sought through an array of electronic and social mechanisms and events coordinated with major community conferences. A report summarizing this input will identify the specific areas where NISO should develop standards or recommended practices, which will be undertaken by a working group convened in phase two. The complete project from initial meetings to publication of standards is expected to take two years. Information about the meetings and other methods for participation will be announced on the NISO website (www.niso.org) and in the monthly Newsline e-newsletter (www.niso.org/publications/newsline/).

http://www.niso.org/news/pr/view?item_key=72efc1097d4caf7b7b5bdf9c54a165818399ec86

参考文献

《科学》社论和《旧金山宣言》：停止使用影响因子评价科学家
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-111883-690753.html

影响因子的终结？
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-111883-702301.html

 

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自许培扬科学网博客。
链接地址：https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-280034-710251.html

上一篇：科学网大学图书馆暑期全部免费开放
下一篇：劝慰一位失恋的研究生