许培扬博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/xupeiyang 跟踪国际前沿服务国内科研

博文

韩春雨论文今日得分362分

已有 2372 次阅读 2016-11-30 07:10 |个人分类:今日热点|系统分类:观点评述

DNA-guided genome editing using the Natronobacterium gregoryi Argonaute
引用
- 作　　者
  Feng Gao, Xiao Z Shen, Feng Jiang, Yongqiang Wu, Chunyu Han
- 研究领域protein designbioinformaticsgenetics
- 发表日期2016
- 期　　刊Nature Biotechnology
- 卷　　号34
- 期　　号7
- 页码范围768-77被引量26
- 3
- DOI10.1038/nbt.3547

2016-11-29

韩春雨同意NBT发表编辑部关注 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=280034&do=blog&id=1017399 2016-11-29 科学研究就 ...(683)次阅读|(2)个评论

Controversial gene-editing study flagged by Nature journalRetraction Watch, 29 Nov 2016

Nature Biotechnology has issued an editorial expression of concern (EOC) for a widely criticized study describing a potentially…

http://retractionwatch.com/2016/11/29/controversial-gene-editing-study-flagged-nature-journal/

DNA-guided genome editing using the Natronobacterium gregoryi Argonaute

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, May 2016

Altmetric Badge

<a class="contextual-help-link" data-type="score" title="About this data" data-content="<h3>What is the Altmetric Attention Score?

The Altmetric Attention Score for a research output provides an indicator of the amount of attention that it has received. The score is derived from an automated algorithm, and represents a weighted count of the amount of attention we've picked up for a research output.

<a target="_blank" href="https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000060969-how-is-the-altmetric-score-calculated-">Click here to learn more about how Altmetric Attention Scores are calculated.

" href="https://nature.altmetric.com/details/7114638/blogs#" style="box-sizing:border-box;margin:0px;padding:0px;border:0px;font-style:inherit;font-variant:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-stretch:inherit;font-size:inherit;line-height:inherit;font-family:inherit;vertical-align:baseline;color:#383844;text-decoration:none;outline:none;"> About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 3,538)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned bynews9 news outletsblogs10 blogstwitter302 tweeterspeer_reviews2 peer review sitesfacebook9 Facebook pageswikipedia1 Wikipedia pagegoogleplus9 Google+ usersreddit1 Redditorf10001 research highlight platform

Readers onmendeley986 Mendeleyciteulike8 CiteULike

SUMMARY News Blogs Twitter Peer reviews Facebook Wikipedia Google+ Reddit Research highlights

<a class="contextual-help-link" data-type="blogs" title="About this data" data-content="<h3>What am I seeing on this tab?

Altmetric automatically searches through a huge collection of blogs for mentions of research outputs. As long as we are tracking the blog, any posts that link directly to research outputs will be added to this tab. Comments are not tracked.

All blogs in our collection have been individually curated and added to the Altmetric database by a member of our team. Learn more <a href="http://www.altmetric.com/sources-blogs.php" target='_blank'>here.

We strive to pick up mentions quickly, but it can take some time to process all of the information we collect, especially at peak times. If something is still missing after a day or so, then let us know by filling out <a href="https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/missedmentions" target="_blank">this form. A member of our team will review your request as soon as possible.

" href="https://nature.altmetric.com/details/7114638/blogs#" style="box-sizing:border-box;margin:0px 0px -24px;padding:0px;border:0px;font-style:inherit;font-variant:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-stretch:inherit;font-size:1.71429em;line-height:1em;font-family:inherit;vertical-align:baseline;color:#3377bb;text-decoration:none;outline:none;display:inline-block;">

So far, Altmetric has seen 11 posts from 10 blogs.

Controversial gene-editing study flagged by Nature journalRetraction Watch, 29 Nov 2016

Nature Biotechnology has issued an editorial expression of concern (EOC) for a widely criticized study describing a potentially…

Dubbi sul sistema di editing genetico NgAgo: non è riproducibileOggiScienza, 25 Nov 2016

CRONACA – Non ha fine la controversia sulla tecnica di editing genetico presentata come l’alternativa alla più famosa CRISPR-Cas9…

Researchers Question NgAgo WorkThe Daily Scan from GenomeWeb, 23 Nov 2016

More questions arise over gene-editing toolRetraction Watch, 17 Nov 2016

A new letter signed by 20 researchers is casting additional doubts on the validity of a potentially invaluable lab tool — and…

Google Forums Round Up: First Impressions of NgAgoAddgene, 04 Aug 2016

This post was contributed by guest blogger Pooran Dewari. Any views in this post are those of the guest blogger and do not…

https://nature.altmetric.com/details/7114638/blogs

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自许培扬科学网博客。
链接地址：https://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-280034-1017580.html

上一篇：书法作业
下一篇：世界艾滋病日 12月1日