求真分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/zlyang 求真务实

博文

[讨论] “遥远恒星轨道速度存在微小差异”是否是“引力磁”的作用?

已有 934 次阅读 2021-1-8 15:03 |系统分类:科研笔记

汉语是联合国官方正式使用的 6种同等有效语言之一。请不要歧视汉语!

Chinese is one of the six equally effective official languages of the United Nations.

Not to discriminate against Chinese, please!

                    

[讨论] “遥远恒星轨道速度存在微小差异”是否是“引力磁”的作用?

              

   “引力磁”的直观含义,就是“质量运动激发的相互作用”,类似“电荷运动激发的磁场”。
   历史上提到“引力磁”的至少不下几十人。名气最大的算是伟大科学家爱因斯坦,其次是奥利弗·亥维赛(Oliver Heaviside)。

        

   考虑到爱因斯坦、Heaviside的人从猜想出发研究引力磁的预言,迄今为止未能得到物理实验的证实,现在,我们是否应该像牛顿一样,从实验事实反推“引力磁”的公式?
          
   历史:
   第谷的太阳系行星轨道
观测开普勒定律 → 牛顿的万有引力定律。

             

   从某种意义上看,牛顿力学、麦克斯韦的经典电磁理论,都是对物理实验事实的归纳和提炼,而不是依据某种信念的逻辑演绎。所以,研究“引力磁”的更合适的途径,是对有关的天文观测和物理实验事实的归纳和提炼。
   Einstein and Heaviside studied the prediction of gravitational magnetism deducing from some conjectures, so far they have not been confirmed by physical experiments. Now, should we research the formula of "gravitational magnetism" from experimental facts like Newton?
   History:
   Tycho's solar system planetary orbit observations → Kepler's laws → Newton's law of universal gravitation.
   From a certain perspective, Newtonian mechanics and Maxwell's classical electromagnetic theory are both induced refined from the facts of physical experiments, rather than the logical deduction based on certain beliefs. Therefore, a better way to research the "gravitational magnetism" is to summarize and refine relevant astronomical observations and physical experiment facts.

         
   Kyu-Hyun Chae 等人或其他人的研究,是否另有解释:引力磁?

         

      物理学,归根到底是个实验科学。所以真傻建议:

 (1)利用地球静止轨道卫星,进行激光等精确测距。

 该轨道的地面高度约为3.6万千米,远在大气层(厚度大约在1000千米)以上。

 这样就回避了地球自转的困扰:地球自转产生的引力磁不起作用了,也就回避了地球质量分布难题。

 地球静止轨道卫星,假如:①每天的距离在变化,②并且也有加速离开地球的额外加速度,则是太阳自转引力磁存在的证据。

  当然,可能还有月球公转的影响。

Physics, in the final analysis, is an experimental science.

   (1) Measuring the distances of the geostationary orbit satellites to the earth by laser ranging or other precise measurements.
   The ground height of the track is about 36,000 kilometers, far above the atmosphere (about 1,000 kilometers thick).
   In this way, the problem of the earth's rotation is avoided: the gravitational magnetism produced by the earth's rotation are absent, and the problem of the earth's mass distribution is also avoided.
   For geostationary orbit satellites, if: ①The distance changes every day, ②And there is additional acceleration that accelerates away from the earth, it is evidence of the existence of the sun's rotation gravitational magnetism.
   Of course, there may also be the influence of the moon's revolution.

                   

参考资料:

[1] 奥利弗·亥维赛(Oliver Heaviside),百度百科
https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%A5%A5%E5%88%A9%E5%BC%97%C2%B7%E4%BA%A5%E7%BB%B4%E8%B5%9B
[2] Oliver Heaviside | British physicist | Britannica
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Oliver-Heaviside
[3] 刘进平,2021-01-07,新的证据表明暗物质可能根本就不存在
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-39731-1266113.html
[4] Kyu-Hyun Chae, Federico Lelli, Harry Desmond. Testing the Strong Equivalence Principle: Detection of the External Field Effect in
Rotationally Supported Galaxies[J]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2020, 904(1): 文献号: 51. 904:51 (20pp), 2020 November 20
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abbb96
[5] 许槑. 引力的“磁性”是怎么回事[J]. 物理通报. 2007,(07): 1-2.
http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/wltb200707001
http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=24961375&from=Qikan_Search_Index
[6] 许槑. 关于引力磁性效应的一则报道[J]. 物理通报. 2007,(08): 54.
http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=25144489
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLASN2019&filename=WLTB200708024&v=jR28ZlG0dElYio7b4QQ46A%25mmd2Fm%25mmd2Bj5z%25mmd2FngKvyulotto4x74uXaPaWCQpg%25mmd2FsxMyubZbz
[7] Gravitoelectromagnetism
http://sergf.ru/gmen.htm

相关链接:
[1] 2013-11-29,引力磁与暗能量的部分定性解释(要点)
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-745733.html
[2] 2020-06-21,[征集] 真科研需要哪些条件?
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1238767.html
[3] 2011-07-08,真傻1981年8月11日日记的扫描
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-463037.html

              

感谢您的指教!

感谢您指正以上任何错误!

感谢您提供更多的相关资料!



http://wap.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1266288.html

上一篇:[找骂] 打破逻辑学对中国科技界的束缚
下一篇:[汇集与简评] 原创,到底难不难发表?

9 郑永军 朱晓刚 刘进平 许培扬 王从彦 宁利中 杨学祥 范振英 李毅伟

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (3 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2021-3-9 06:35

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部